Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 381

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparison of potassium currents in rabbit atrial and ventricular cells.

Open access
Giles, W R, Imaizumi, Y·1988·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

1. In rabbit and human hearts there are significant differences in the action potential configuration in atrium and ventricle, and the action potential waveform exhibits marked frequency dependence in both tissues. To study the ionic mechanism(s) of these phenomena, the size and time course of the potassium (K+) currents responsible for repolarization have been recorded from single cells using a whole‐cell microelectrode voltage clamp method. 2. At physiological heart rates, the action potential in atrial cells has a short plateau phase; however, the rapid early repolarization is strongly frequency dependent. Ventricular myocytes have a long plateau (400‐700 ms at 23 degrees C), and the late repolarizing phase of the action potential is much faster in ventricle than in atrium. 3. In both cell types, four different outward currents can be recorded: (i) a large transient outward current, It; (ii) IK(Ca), a smaller Ca2+‐dependent K+ current; (iii) IK, a small, maintained time‐ and voltage‐dependent delayed rectifier K+ current; (iv) IK1, an inwardly rectifying K+ current. 4. It, which is responsible for early repolarization, is much larger in atrium than in ventricle. It has very rapid activation and inactivation kinetics but a very slow time course of recovery from inactivation (tau = 5.4 s at 23 degrees C). Our results show that the reactivation kinetics of It are responsible for the pronounced dependence of the shape of the atrial action potential on stimulus frequency. 5. IK(Ca) is variable from cell to cell and is larger in atrium than in ventricle. In both cell types, IK(Ca) is much smaller than It. 6. The delayed rectifier current, IK, is very small and turns on relatively slowly in both cell types. It is therefore not activated strongly during the relatively short plateau of the atrial action potential. Even in ventricle, it contributes only a small repolarizing current. 7. IK1, the inward rectifier K+ current, is much larger in ventricle than in atrium. The current‐voltage relationship for IK1 in ventricle exhibits a negative slope conductance between ‐50 and 0 mV. IK1 is the outward current which generates the resting membrane potential and it modulates the final repolarization phase of the action potential in both cell types. 8. These data strongly suggest that the action potential configuration and its frequency dependence in rabbit atrial and ventricular cells are mainly due to the differences in sizes and kinetics of It and IK1.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.1988.sp017325

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 381

Metadata

Authors
Giles, W. R., & Imaizumi, Y.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1988-11
Volume
405
Issue
1
Pages
123-145
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W1992532194
Cited by
381
References
2
FWCI
11.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of potassium currents in rabbit atrial and ventricular cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1988.sp017325
The paper
Giles, W. R., & Imaizumi, Y. (1988). Comparison of potassium currents in rabbit atrial and ventricular cells. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1988.sp017325

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.