Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 169

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The effect of external pH changes on responses to excitatory amino acids in mouse hippocampal neurones.

Open access
Vyklický, L, Vlachová, V, Krůsek, J·1990·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

1. The whole‐cell and outside‐out configurations of the patch‐clamp technique were used to record responses to excitatory amino acids in mouse hippocampal neurones in cell culture at different pH. The amino acids kainate, quisqualate, N‐methyl‐D‐aspartate (NMDA) and L‐glutamate were applied by a rapid perfusion system. 2. In the whole‐cell recording mode the responses to NMDA or to low concentrations of glutamate, recorded in the absence of Mg2+ and with glycine in the extracellular superfusion solution, were antagonized by acidic pH and potentiated by an alkaline extracellular solution. Decrease in pH from 7.3 to 6.0 reduced NMDA responses to 33 +/‐ 2% and an increase in pH from 7.3 to 8.0 potentiated it to 141 +/‐ 6%. The responses to quisqualate and kainate were only slightly changed by altering the pH from 7.3 to 6.3 or 8.3. 3. The equilibrium dissociation constant (Kd) for H+ antagonism of responses to NMDA, estimated from the fit of a single‐binding‐site adsorption isotherm, was calculated to be 0.25 +/‐ 0.06 microM, corresponding to pH 6.6 +/‐ 0.1. The H+ attenuation of NMDA current was voltage independent at membrane potentials ‐60 to +30 mV. 4. H+ antagonism of responses to NMDA was reduced when the NMDA concentration was lowered. In the pH range 6.3‐8.3 the H(+)‐induced reduction did not vary with the concentration of glycine or Mg2+. The sensitivity of NMDA current to Zn2+ was unchanged in the pH range 6.3 +/‐ 8.0. These results suggest that H+ ions do not directly interfere with the binding of NMDA to its agonist recognition site or with the binding of glycine, Mg2+ and Zn2+ to the specific allosteric sites on the NMDA receptor‐channel complex. 5. In outside‐out patches held at ‐60 mV, unitary NMDA‐activated currents were recorded at pH 7.3 and 6.3. The mean NMDA single‐channel conductance (gamma) obtained for the largest and most frequent openings were: gamma 7.3 = 52.5 +/‐ 0.8 pS and gamma 6.3 = 51.8 +/‐ 0.9 pS. The duration of the mean channel open time, tau o, decreased from 4.75 +/‐ 0.25 ms in the control at pH 7.3 to 3.59 +/‐ 0.21 ms at pH 6.3. The mean burst duration, tau b, was reduced from 8.51 +/‐ 0.78 ms at control pH 7.3 to 5.1 +/‐ 0.34 ms at pH 6.3. The frequency of NMDA channel bursts was reduced by 31%.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.1990.sp018304

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 169

Metadata

Authors
Vyklický, L., Vlachová, V, & Krůsek, J.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1990-11
Volume
430
Issue
1
Pages
497-517
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W2070215573
Cited by
169
References
1
FWCI
3.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The effect of external pH changes on responses to excitatory amino acids in mouse hippocampal neurones. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1990.sp018304
The paper
Vyklický, L., Vlachová, V, & Krůsek, J. (1990). The effect of external pH changes on responses to excitatory amino acids in mouse hippocampal neurones. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1990.sp018304

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.