Cited by 216Retinal Development and DisordersIon channel regulation and functionPhotoreceptor and optogenetics research

Response properties of cones from the retina of the tiger salamander

Open access
Perry, R J, McNaughton, P A·1991·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

1. Spectral sensitivity measurements using the suction electrode technique reveal three types of cone in the retina of the tiger salamander, showing maximum sensitivity at wavelengths 610 nm (red-sensitive cone), 444 nm (blue-sensitive cone) and below 400 nm (UV-sensitive cone). 2. The absolute sensitivities of red- and blue-sensitive cones to flashes of optimal wavelength are 0.022 and 0.33 pA photon-1 micron 2 respectively. 3. The time-to-peak of the dim flash response and the recovery of membrane current after a flash of any intensity are fastest in red-sensitive and slowest in blue-sensitive cones. 4. In blue- and UV-sensitive cones the flash response peaks progressively earlier as the flash strength is increased, as in rods. In red-sensitive cones, however, bright flash responses take longer to peak than dim flash responses. 5. In all three cone types, voltage clamping at -40 mV reduces the time-to-peak of the response to a bright flash, showing that the rising phase of the bright flash response is normally limited by the time constant of the cell. Under voltage clamp, all cones show a decrease in time-to-peak with increasing flash intensity. 6. Voltage clamping red-sensitive cones reveals two components of the rising phase of the response to a bright flash. Most of the current is rapidly suppressed by a bright flash, and represents the closure of light-sensitive channels. The residual current decays with a mean time constant of 20 ms, and is probably attributable to the…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.1991.sp018444

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cone photoreceptors regain sensitivity and regenerate visual pigment more rapidly than rods.

    “The rates of sensitivity recovery (Perry and McNaughton, 1991) and visual pigment regeneration (Schnapf et al., 1990) are greater in cones than in rods (Baylor et al., 1979; Baylor et al., 1984).”

    From New insights into retinoid metabolism and cycling within the retina (2013) · cites this paper as Perry and McNaughton, 1991

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Perry, R. J., & McNaughton, P. A.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1991-02
Volume
433
Issue
1
Pages
561-587
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W2000033611
Cited by
216
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion channel regulation and function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
Keywords
retinal cones, tiger salamander, spectral sensitivity, red-sensitive cones, blue-sensitive cones, voltage clamp, calcium current, membrane time constant, photoreceptor recovery
MeSH terms
Ambystoma, Animals, Calcium, Evoked Potentials, Visual, Kinetics, Light, Photic Stimulation, Photoreceptor Cells, Potassium, Sodium, Spectrophotometry, Ion Transport, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review