Response properties of cones from the retina of the tiger salamander
Open accessAbstract
1. Spectral sensitivity measurements using the suction electrode technique reveal three types of cone in the retina of the tiger salamander, showing maximum sensitivity at wavelengths 610 nm (red-sensitive cone), 444 nm (blue-sensitive cone) and below 400 nm (UV-sensitive cone). 2. The absolute sensitivities of red- and blue-sensitive cones to flashes of optimal wavelength are 0.022 and 0.33 pA photon-1 micron 2 respectively. 3. The time-to-peak of the dim flash response and the recovery of membrane current after a flash of any intensity are fastest in red-sensitive and slowest in blue-sensitive cones. 4. In blue- and UV-sensitive cones the flash response peaks progressively earlier as the flash strength is increased, as in rods. In red-sensitive cones, however, bright flash responses take longer to peak than dim flash responses. 5. In all three cone types, voltage clamping at -40 mV reduces the time-to-peak of the response to a bright flash, showing that the rising phase of the bright flash response is normally limited by the time constant of the cell. Under voltage clamp, all cones show a decrease in time-to-peak with increasing flash intensity. 6. Voltage clamping red-sensitive cones reveals two components of the rising phase of the response to a bright flash. Most of the current is rapidly suppressed by a bright flash, and represents the closure of light-sensitive channels. The residual current decays with a mean time constant of 20 ms, and is probably attributable to the…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cone photoreceptors regain sensitivity and regenerate visual pigment more rapidly than rods.
“The rates of sensitivity recovery (Perry and McNaughton, 1991) and visual pigment regeneration (Schnapf et al., 1990) are greater in cones than in rods (Baylor et al., 1979; Baylor et al., 1984).”
From New insights into retinoid metabolism and cycling within the retina (2013) · cites this paper as Perry and McNaughton, 1991
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Isomerization and Oxidation of Vitamin A in Cone-Dominant Retinas
Mata, N. L., Radu, R. A., Clemmons, R. S., & Travis, G. H. (2002) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00912-1 · Cited by 382 · see citing works
New insights into retinoid metabolism and cycling within the retina
Tang, P. H., Kono, M., Koutalos, Y., Ablonczy, Z., & Crouch, R. K. (2013) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2012.09.002 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
“The rates of sensitivity recovery (Perry and McNaughton, 1991) and visual pigment regeneration (Schnapf et al., 1990) are greater in cones than in rods (Baylor et al., 1979, 1984).”
Prinsen, C. F. M., Szerencsei, R. T., & Schnetkamp, P. P. M. (2000) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.20-04-01424.2000 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
“…in rod and cone photoreceptors, respectively; the fraction of the dark current that is carried by calcium ions is much greater in cone cGMP-gated channels compared with rod cGMP-gated channels (Perry and McNaughton, 1991; Frings et al., 1995; Picones and Korenbrot, 1995; Dzeja et al., 1999).”
BackgroundConley, S. M., Cai, X., Makkia, R., Wu, Y., Sparrow, J. R., & Naash, M. I. (2012) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease · doi:10.1016/j.bbadis.2011.10.007 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Sheng, J.-Z., Prinsen, C. F. M., Clark, R. B., Giles, W. R., & Schnetkamp, P. P. M. (2000) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(00)76443-5 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
- Authors
- Perry, R. J., & McNaughton, P. A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1991-02
- Volume
- 433
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 561-587
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- PMC
- PMC1181389
- OpenAlex
- W2000033611
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 2.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- The Journal of Physiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion channel regulation and function
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
- Keywords
- retinal cones, tiger salamander, spectral sensitivity, red-sensitive cones, blue-sensitive cones, voltage clamp, calcium current, membrane time constant, photoreceptor recovery
- MeSH terms
- Ambystoma, Animals, Calcium, Evoked Potentials, Visual, Kinetics, Light, Photic Stimulation, Photoreceptor Cells, Potassium, Sodium, Spectrophotometry, Ion Transport, In Vitro Techniques
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review