Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 260

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fast and slow components of unitary EPSCs on stellate cells elicited by focal stimulation in slices of rat visual cortex.

Open access
Stern, P, Edwards, F A, Sakmann, B·1992·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

1. Voltage and current recordings were made from visually identified non‐pyramidal neurones in slices of layer IV of rat primary visual cortex using the whole‐cell configuration of the patch clamp technique. These neurones are characterized by a high input resistance (0.5‐2 G omega) and a non‐adaptive behaviour of action potential frequency following depolarizing current injection, which suggests that they are stellate cells. 2. Excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) were recorded from these neurones during focal stimulation of neighbouring cells by a second patch pipette, the tip of which was placed on the soma of the stimulated cell. The response amplitude as a function of stimulus strength showed a sharp increase at a critical stimulus strength suggesting that stimulus‐evoked currents represent unitary EPSCs. 3. In most cases the latencies of stimulus‐evoked EPSCs were unimodally distributed with means in the range of 2.1‐3.6 ms. In some experiments two peaks were seen in the distribution of latencies. The EPSC rise times, measured as the time from 20 to 80% peak amplitude, fell into a distribution ranging from 0.1 to 0.8 ms with a peak at 0.2 ms. The EPSC decay time course at ‐70 mV membrane potential was fitted by a single exponential with a time constant of 2.39 +/‐ 0.99 ms (mean +/‐ S.D.). The rise and decay times were independent of EPSC peak amplitudes. 4. The peak amplitude of successive unitary EPSCs, elicited by a constant stimulus, fluctuated at random. At a holding potential of ‐70 mV the peak amplitudes varied between 5 and 90 pA. In two out of ten cells the histogram of peak amplitudes could be well fitted by the sum of several equidistant Gaussians with a peak distance of around 10 pA. This suggests that the quantal conductance change underlying the peak current fluctuations is of the order of 100 pS. 5. At membrane potentials more positive than ‐70 mV the decay of stimulus‐evoked EPSCs showed two components with very different time courses. In standard extracellular solution the current‐voltage (I‐V) relation for the fast component was almost linear whereas the slow component showed a J‐shaped I‐V relation with a region of negative slope conductance between ‐30 and ‐70 mV.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.1992.sp019085

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 50 references

Cited by

See all 260

Metadata

Authors
Stern, P., Edwards, F. A., & Sakmann, B.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1992-04
Volume
449
Issue
1
Pages
247-278
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W1982662582
Cited by
260
References
50
FWCI
12.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fast and slow components of unitary EPSCs on stellate cells elicited by focal stimulation in slices of rat visual cortex. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1992.sp019085
The paper
Stern, P., Edwards, F. A., & Sakmann, B. (1992). Fast and slow components of unitary EPSCs on stellate cells elicited by focal stimulation in slices of rat visual cortex. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1992.sp019085

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.