Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 193

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Properties of cloned ATP‐sensitive K+ currents expressed in Xenopus oocytes.

Open access
Gribble, F M, Ashfield, R, Ammälä, C, Ashcroft, F M·1997·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

1. We have studied the electrophysiological properties of cloned ATP‐sensitive K+ channels (KATP channels) heterologously expressed in Xenopus oocytes. This channel comprises a sulphonylurea receptor subunit (SUR) and an inwardly rectifying K+ channel subunit (Kir). 2. Oocytes injected with SUR1 and either Kir6.2 or Kir6.1 exhibited large inwardly rectifying K+ currents when cytosolic ATP levels were lowered by the metabolic inhibitors azide or FCCP. No currents were observed in response to azide in oocytes injected with Kir6.2, Kir6.1 or SUR1 alone, indicating that both the sulphonylurea receptor (SUR1) and an inward rectifier (Kir6.1 or Kir6.2) are needed for functional channel activity. 3. The pharmacological properties of Kir6.2‐SUR1 currents resembled those of native beta‐cell ATP‐sensitive K+ channel currents (KATP currents): the currents were > 90% blocked by tolbutamide (500 microM), meglitinide (10 microM) or glibenclamide (100 nM), and activated 1.8‐fold by diazoxide (340 microM), 1.4‐fold by pinacidil (1 mM) and unaffected by cromakalim (0.5 mM). 4. Macroscopic Kir6.2‐SUR1 currents in inside‐out patches were inhibited by ATP with a Ki of 28 microM. Kir6.1‐SUR1 currents ran down within seconds of patch excision preventing analysis of ATP sensitivity. 5. No sensitivity to tolbutamide or metabolic inhibition was observed when SUR1 was coexpressed with either Kir1.1a or Kir2.1, suggesting that these proteins do not couple in Xenopus ocytes. 6. Our data demonstrate that the Xenopus oocyte constitutes a good expression system for cloned KATP channels and that expression may be assayed by azide‐induced metabolic inhibition.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.1997.sp021843

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 193

Metadata

Authors
Gribble, F. M., Ashfield, R., Ammälä, C., & Ashcroft, F. M.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1997-01
Volume
498
Issue
1
Pages
87-98
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W2146201166
Cited by
193
References
1
FWCI
7.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Properties of cloned ATP‐sensitive K+ currents expressed in Xenopus oocytes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1997.sp021843
The paper
Gribble, F. M., Ashfield, R., Ammälä, C., & Ashcroft, F. M. (1997). Properties of cloned ATP‐sensitive K+ currents expressed in Xenopus oocytes. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1997.sp021843

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.