The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mechanisms of intracortical I‐wave facilitation elicited with paired‐pulse magnetic stimulation in humans
Open accessAbstract
In order to elucidate the mechanisms underlying intracortical I‐wave facilitation elicited by paired‐pulse magnetic stimulation, we compared intracortical facilitation of I1‐waves with that of I3‐waves using single motor unit and surface electromyographic (EMG) recordings from the first dorsal interosseous muscle (FDI). We used a suprathreshold first stimulus (S1) and a subthreshold second stimulus (S2). In most experiments, both stimuli induced currents in the same direction. In others, S1 induced posteriorly directed currents and S2 induced anteriorly directed currents. When both stimuli induced anteriorly directed currents (I1‐wave effects), an interstimulus interval (ISI) of 1.5 ms resulted in extra facilitation of the responses to S1 alone. The latency of this effect was equivalent to that of the I2‐wave from S1. When S1 evoked posteriorly directed currents (I3‐wave recruitment), facilitation occurred at a latency corresponding to the I3‐wave from S1. This facilitation occurred at an ISI of 1.5 ms when both S1 and S2 flowed posteriorly, and at an ISI of approximately 3.5 ms when S1 was posteriorly and S2 was anteriorly directed. Based on these findings, we propose the following mechanisms for intracortical I‐wave facilitation. When S1 and S2 induce currents in the same direction, facilitation is produced by summation between excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) elicited by S1 and subliminal depolarization of interneurones elicited by S2 directly. When S1 and S2 induce currents in the opposite direction, facilitation is produced by the same mechanism as above or by temporal and spatial summation of EPSPs elicited by two successive stimuli at interneurones or corticospinal neurones of the motor cortex.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Rossini, P. M., Burke, D., Chen, R., Cohen, L. G., Daskalakis, Z., Di Iorio, R., Di Lazzaro, V., Ferreri, F., Fitzgerald, P. B., George, M. S., et al. (2015) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2015.02.001 · Cited by 2,753
Self-citationSiebner, H. R., Funke, K., Aberra, A. S., Antal, A., Bestmann, S., Chen, R., Classen, J., Davare, M., Di Lazzaro, V., Fox, P. T., et al. (2022) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2022.04.022 · Cited by 566
Self-citationPaulus, W., Classen, J., Cohen, L. G., Large, C. H., Di Lazzaro, V., Nitsche, M., Pascual-Leone, A., Rosenow, F., Rothwell, J. C., & Ziemann, U. (2008) · Brain Stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2008.06.002 · Cited by 414
Transcranial magnetic stimulation and synaptic plasticity: Experimental framework and human models
Thickbroom, G. W. (2007) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-007-0991-3 · Cited by 326
Salehinejad, M. A., Ghanavati, E., Reinders, J., Hengstler, J. G., Kuo, M.-F., & Nitsche, M. A. (2022) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.69308 · Cited by 94
Metadata
- Authors
- Hanajima, R., Ugawa, Y., Terao, Y., Enomoto, H., Shiio, Y., Mochizuki, H., Furubayashi, T., Uesugi, H., Iwata, N. K., & Kanazawa, I.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-01
- Volume
- 538
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 253-261
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W1966095518
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mechanisms of intracortical I‐wave facilitation elicited with paired‐pulse magnetic stimulation in humans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.2001.013094
- The paper
- Hanajima, R., Ugawa, Y., Terao, Y., Enomoto, H., Shiio, Y., Mochizuki, H., Furubayashi, T., Uesugi, H., Iwata, N. K., & Kanazawa, I. (2002). Mechanisms of intracortical I‐wave facilitation elicited with paired‐pulse magnetic stimulation in humans. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2001.013094
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.