Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 215

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Mechanisms of intracortical I‐wave facilitation elicited with paired‐pulse magnetic stimulation in humans

Open access
Hanajima, Ritsuko, Ugawa, Yoshikazu, Terao, Yasuo, Enomoto, Hiroyuki, Shiio, Yasushi, Mochizuki, Hitoshi, Furubayashi, Toshiaki, Uesugi, Haruo, Iwata, Nobue Kobayashi, Kanazawa, Ichiro·2002·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

In order to elucidate the mechanisms underlying intracortical I‐wave facilitation elicited by paired‐pulse magnetic stimulation, we compared intracortical facilitation of I1‐waves with that of I3‐waves using single motor unit and surface electromyographic (EMG) recordings from the first dorsal interosseous muscle (FDI). We used a suprathreshold first stimulus (S1) and a subthreshold second stimulus (S2). In most experiments, both stimuli induced currents in the same direction. In others, S1 induced posteriorly directed currents and S2 induced anteriorly directed currents. When both stimuli induced anteriorly directed currents (I1‐wave effects), an interstimulus interval (ISI) of 1.5 ms resulted in extra facilitation of the responses to S1 alone. The latency of this effect was equivalent to that of the I2‐wave from S1. When S1 evoked posteriorly directed currents (I3‐wave recruitment), facilitation occurred at a latency corresponding to the I3‐wave from S1. This facilitation occurred at an ISI of 1.5 ms when both S1 and S2 flowed posteriorly, and at an ISI of approximately 3.5 ms when S1 was posteriorly and S2 was anteriorly directed. Based on these findings, we propose the following mechanisms for intracortical I‐wave facilitation. When S1 and S2 induce currents in the same direction, facilitation is produced by summation between excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) elicited by S1 and subliminal depolarization of interneurones elicited by S2 directly. When S1 and S2 induce currents in the opposite direction, facilitation is produced by the same mechanism as above or by temporal and spatial summation of EPSPs elicited by two successive stimuli at interneurones or corticospinal neurones of the motor cortex.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.2001.013094

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 215

Metadata

Authors
Hanajima, R., Ugawa, Y., Terao, Y., Enomoto, H., Shiio, Y., Mochizuki, H., Furubayashi, T., Uesugi, H., Iwata, N. K., & Kanazawa, I.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-01
Volume
538
Issue
1
Pages
253-261
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W1966095518
Cited by
215
References
0
FWCI
3.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mechanisms of intracortical I‐wave facilitation elicited with paired‐pulse magnetic stimulation in humans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.2001.013094
The paper
Hanajima, R., Ugawa, Y., Terao, Y., Enomoto, H., Shiio, Y., Mochizuki, H., Furubayashi, T., Uesugi, H., Iwata, N. K., & Kanazawa, I. (2002). Mechanisms of intracortical I‐wave facilitation elicited with paired‐pulse magnetic stimulation in humans. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2001.013094

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.