Cited by 326Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeurological disorders and treatments

Transcranial magnetic stimulation and synaptic plasticity: Experimental framework and human models

Thickbroom, Gary W.·2007·Experimental Brain Research

Abstract

Interest in the therapeutic potential of non-invasive human brain stimulation has been boosted by an improved understanding of the mechanisms of synaptic plasticity and the stimulus protocols that can induce plasticity in experimental preparations. A range of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) protocols are available that have the potential to mimic these experimental protocols in the human. Repetitive TMS emulates aspects of activity-dependent plasticity, and theta-burst refinements may be able to take into account excitatory and inhibitory networks, paired associative stimulation can extend network considerations to incorporate sensorimotor integration, inhibitory networks may be targeted with short-interval paired stimulation and finally even the precision of spike-timing dependent plasticity may be accessible through I-(indirect)wave dynamics. This review will provide a synthesis of current concepts of activity- and time-dependent plasticity and their homeostatic regulation based on experimental studies, and relate these concepts to the promising range of TMS interventions that are available to target human brain plasticity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00221-007-0991-3

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thickbroom, G. W.
Affiliations
The University of Western Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Thickbroom, Gary W.
Venue
Experimental Brain Research
Published
2007-06-12
Volume
180
Issue
4
Pages
583-593
ISSN
  • 0014-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1106
OpenAlex
W2064656928
Cited by
326
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 23
FWCI
1.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Experimental Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
Keywords
transcranial magnetic stimulation, synaptic plasticity, repetitive TMS, theta burst stimulation, paired associative stimulation, spike-timing-dependent plasticity, activity-dependent plasticity, homeostatic regulation, non-invasive brain stimulation, inhibitory networks, sensorimotor integration
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Brain, Humans, Models, Neurological, Nerve Net, Neural Inhibition, Synaptic Transmission, Neuronal Plasticity, Synapses, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review