The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Differential effect of muscle vibration on intracortical inhibitory circuits in humans
Open accessAbstract
Low amplitude muscle vibration (0.5 ms; 80 Hz; duration 1.5 s) was applied in turn to each of three different intrinsic hand muscles (first dorsal interosseus, FDI; abductor pollicis brevis, APB; and abductor digiti minimi, ADM) in order to test its effect on the EMG responses evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Recordings were also taken from flexor and extensor carpi radialis (FCR and ECR, respectively). We evaluated the amplitude of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) produced by a single TMS pulse, short interval intracortical inhibition and facilitation (SICI and ICF) and long interval intracortical inhibition (LICI). TMS pulses were applied 1 s after the start of vibration with subjects relaxed throughout. Vibration increased the amplitude of MEPs evoked in the vibrated muscle (162 ± 6 % of MEP with no vibration; mean ±s.e.m.), but suppressed MEPs in the two non‐vibrated hand muscles (72 ± 9 %). Compared with no vibration (test response reduced to 51 ± 5 % of control), there was less SICI in the vibrated muscle (test response reduced to 92 ± 28 % of control) and more in the non‐vibrated hand muscles (test response reduced to 27 ± 5 % of control). The opposite occurred for LICI: compared with the no vibration condition (test response reduced to 33 ± 6 % control), there was more LICI in the vibrated muscle (test response reduced to 17 ± 3 % control) than in the non‐vibrated hand muscles (test response reduced to 80 ± 11 % control) even when the intensity of the test stimulus was adjusted to compensate for the changes in baseline MEP. There was no effect on ICF. Cutaneous stimulation of the index finger (80 Hz, 1.5 s duration, twice sensory threshold) had no consistent differential effect on any of the parameters. We conclude that vibratory input from muscle can differentially modulate excitability in motor cortical circuits.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Differential effects on motorcortical inhibition induced by blockade of GABA uptake in humans
Werhahn, K. J., Kunesch, E., Noachtar, S., Benecke, R., & Classen, J. (1999) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7793.1999.0591t.x · Cited by 887
Cited by
Reis, J., Swayne, O. B., Vandermeeren, Y., Camus, M., Dimyan, M. A., Harris‐Love, M., Perez, M. A., Ragert, P., Rothwell, J. C., & Cohen, L. G. (2008) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2007.144824 · Cited by 583
Self-citationIntracortical inhibition during volitional inhibition of prepared action
Coxon, J. P., Stinear, C. M., & Byblow, W. D. (2006) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.01334.2005 · Cited by 337
Rosenkranz, K., Kacar, A., & Rothwell, J. C. (2007) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2663-07.2007 · Cited by 324
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Rosenkranz, K., & Rothwell, J. C.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-09
- Volume
- 551
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 649-660
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W1990361662
- Cited by
- 239
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.