The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Contribution of transcranial magnetic stimulation to the understanding of cortical mechanisms involved in motor control
Open accessAbstract
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was initially used to evaluate the integrity of the corticospinal tract in humans non‐invasively. Since these early studies, the development of paired‐pulse and repetitive TMS protocols allowed investigators to explore inhibitory and excitatory interactions of various motor and non‐motor cortical regions within and across cerebral hemispheres. These applications have provided insight into the intracortical physiological processes underlying the functional role of different brain regions in various cognitive processes, motor control in health and disease and neuroplastic changes during recovery of function after brain lesions. Used in combination with neuroimaging tools, TMS provides valuable information on functional connectivity between different brain regions, and on the relationship between physiological processes and the anatomical configuration of specific brain areas and connected pathways. More recently, there has been increasing interest in the extent to which these physiological processes are modulated depending on the behavioural setting. The purpose of this paper is (a) to present an up‐to‐date review of the available electrophysiological data and the impact on our understanding of human motor behaviour and (b) to discuss some of the gaps in our present knowledge as well as future directions of research in a format accessible to new students and/or investigators. Finally, areas of uncertainty and limitations in the interpretation of TMS studies are discussed in some detail.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Basal ganglia and cerebellar loops: motor and cognitive circuits
Middleton, F. (2000) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0165-0173(99)00040-5 · Cited by 1,940
Rapid plasticity of human cortical movement representation induced by practice
Classen, J., Liepert, J., Wise, S. P., Hallett, M., & Cohen, L. G. (1998) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1998.79.2.1117 · Cited by 1,156
Self-citationDifferential effects on motorcortical inhibition induced by blockade of GABA uptake in humans
Werhahn, K. J., Kunesch, E., Noachtar, S., Benecke, R., & Classen, J. (1999) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7793.1999.0591t.x · Cited by 887
Early consolidation in human primary motor cortex
Muellbacher, W., Ziemann, U., Wissel, J., Dang, N., Kofler, M., Facchini, S., Boroojerdi, B., Poewe, W., & Hallett, M. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature712 · Cited by 803 · cited 1×
“The disruptive effect was specific for M1 and was not found when stimulating the visual cortex indicating that M1 is involved in the early phase of motor consolidation (Muellbacher et al. 2002).”
BackgroundMotor learning elicited by voluntary drive
Lotze, M. (2003) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awg079 · Cited by 691
Dextromethorphan decreases the excitability of the human motor cortex
Ziemann, U., Chen, R., Cohen, L. G., & Hallett, M. (1998) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.51.5.1320 · Cited by 422
Self-citationExpectancy Induces Dynamic Modulation of Corticospinal Excitability
van Elswijk, G., Kleine, B. U., Overeem, S., & Stegeman, D. F. (2007) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2007.19.1.121 · Cited by 101
Cited by
A unified framework for inhibitory control
Munakata, Y., Herd, S. A., Chatham, C. H., Depue, B. E., Banich, M. T., & O’Reilly, R. C. (2011) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.07.011 · Cited by 699
Noninvasive brain stimulation: from physiology to network dynamics and back
Dayan, E., Censor, N., Buch, E. R., Sandrini, M., & Cohen, L. G. (2013) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3422 · Cited by 585
Self-citationState-dependency in brain stimulation studies of perception and cognition
Silvanto, J., Muggleton, N., & Walsh, V. (2008) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.09.004 · Cited by 572
How does the corpus callosum mediate interhemispheric transfer? A review
van der Knaap, L. J., & van der Ham, I. J. M. (2011) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2011.04.018 · Cited by 473
Modulation of cerebellar excitability by polarity-specific noninvasive direct current stimulation
Galea, J. M., Jayaram, G., Ajagbe, L., & Celnik, P. (2009) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2184-09.2009 · Cited by 472
Metadata
- Authors
- Reis, J., Swayne, O. B., Vandermeeren, Y., Camus, M., Dimyan, M. A., Harris‐Love, M., Perez, M. A., Ragert, P., Rothwell, J. C., & Cohen, L. G.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-01-14
- Volume
- 586
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 325-351
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W2171461222
- Cited by
- 583
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 17.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Contribution of transcranial magnetic stimulation to the understanding of cortical mechanisms involved in motor control. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.2007.144824
- The paper
- Reis, J., Swayne, O. B., Vandermeeren, Y., Camus, M., Dimyan, M. A., Harris‐Love, M., Perez, M. A., Ragert, P., Rothwell, J. C., & Cohen, L. G. (2008). Contribution of transcranial magnetic stimulation to the understanding of cortical mechanisms involved in motor control. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2007.144824
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.