The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recapture after exocytosis causes differential retention of protein in granules of bovine chromaffin cells
Abstract
After exocytosis, chromaffin granules release essentially all their catecholamines in small fractions of a second, but it is unknown how fast they release stored peptides and proteins. Here we compare the exocytic release of fluorescently labelled neuropeptide Y (NPY) and tissue plasminogen activator from single granules. Exocytosis was tracked by measuring the membrane capacitance, and single granules in live cells were imaged by evanescent field microscopy. Neuropeptide Y left most granules in small fractions of a second, while tissue plasminogen activator remained in open granules for minutes. Taking advantage of the dependence on pH of the fluorescence of green fluorescent protein, we used rhythmic external acidification to determine whether and when granules re‐sealed. One‐third of them re‐sealed within 100 s and retained significant levels of tissue plasminogen activator. Re‐sealing accounts for only a fraction of the endocytosis monitored in capacitance measurements. When external [Ca 2+] was raised, even neuropeptide Y remained in open granules until they re‐sealed. It is concluded that a significant fraction of chromaffin granules re‐seal after exocytosis, and retain those proteins that leave granules slowly. We suggest that granules vary the stoichiometry of release by varying both granule re‐sealing and the association of proteins with the granule matrix.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wightman, R. M., Jankowski, J. A., Kennedy, R. T., Kawagoe, K. T., Schroeder, T. J., Leszczyszyn, D. J., Near, J. A., Diliberto, E. J., & Viveros, O. H. (1991) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.88.23.10754 · Cited by 893
Cited by
Merrifield, C. J., Perrais, D., & Zenisek, D. (2005) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2005.03.015 · Cited by 476
Self-citationMechanisms, locations, and kinetics of synaptic BDNF secretion: An update
Leßmann, V., & Brigadski, T. (2009) · Neuroscience Research · doi:10.1016/j.neures.2009.06.004 · Cited by 337
The physiological role of α‐synuclein and its relationship to Parkinson’s Disease
Sulzer, D., & Edwards, R. H. (2019) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1111/jnc.14810 · Cited by 312
α-Synuclein promotes dilation of the exocytotic fusion pore
Logan, T., Bendor, J., Toupin, C., Thorn, K., & Edwards, R. H. (2017) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4529 · Cited by 267
Matsuda, N., Lu, H., Fukata, Y., Noritake, J., Gao, H., Mukherjee, S., Nemoto, T., Fukata, M., & Poo, M.-M. (2009) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1863-09.2009 · Cited by 260
Metadata
- Authors
- Perrais, D., Kleppe, I. C., Taraska, J. W., & Almers, W.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-10
- Volume
- 560
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 413-428
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W1495115482
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.