Auditory stimulus equivalence and non-arbitrary relations
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Studies have shown that formal stimulus properties, such as word color or speaker voice, can disrupt previously established symbolic functions.
“More recently, studies demonstrated that formal properties such as the color of a written word or the speaker's voice are capable of interfering and disrupting already established symbolic functions (Kenny et al., 2014;Stewart et al., 2002;Stewart & Lavelle, 2013).”
From A Process-Based Analysis of Cognitive Defusion in Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (2023) · cites this paper as Stewart & Lavelle, 2013
More recent studies demonstrated that formal properties such as the color of a written word or the speaker's voice can interfere with and disrupt already established symbolic functions.
“More recently, studies demonstrated that formal properties such as the color of a written word or the speaker's voice are capable of interfering and disrupting already established symbolic functions (Kenny et al., 2014;Stewart et al., 2002;Stewart & Lavelle, 2013).”
From A Process-Based Analysis of Cognitive Defusion in Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (2023) · cites this paper as Stewart & Lavelle, 2013
Cites
Stimulus Equivalence and Nonarbitrary Relations
Stewart, I., Barnes-Holmes, D., Roche, B., & Smeets, P. M. (2002) · The Psychological Record · doi:10.1007/bf03395415 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Process-Based Analysis of Cognitive Defusion in Acceptance and Commitment Therapy
Assaz, D. A., Tyndall, I., Oshiro, C. K. B., & Roche, B. (2023) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.beth.2022.06.003 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
- Authors
- Stewart, I., & Lavelle, N.
- Affiliations
- Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE)
- ORCID
- Stewart, Ian
- Venue
- The Psychological Record
- Publisher
- The Psychological Record
- Published
- 2013-07-10
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 409-426
- ISSN
- 0033-2933 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2329740445
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 0.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Psychological Record (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
- Social Sciences › Psychology › General Psychology › Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
- Keywords
- stimulus equivalence, auditory perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
