FEM and VonMises analyses of different dental implant shapes for masticatory loading distribution
Open accessAbstract
The rehabilitation of edentulous patients is today a challenge for the clinicians. The healthy of the hard and soft issue may be considered a fundamental element for having long-term results. The dental implant progresses about the predictable and safe results made this technique chosen from a large group of practitioners. However some problems related intra-operative and postoperative conditions may create discomfort on the patients and consequently to the clinician. The unfavourable results are often related to the bone tissue quality but sometime the dental implant shape and the prosthesis framework may undergo to technical difficulties. The purpose of this work is, through the use of appropriate FEM models, to analyse the effect of all these parameters in the construction of a prosthesis type "Toronto", evaluating all the surgical and prosthetic components in order to direct the choices made by the surgeon and to optimize the distribution of loads reducing the patient's discomfort and having a long term clinical success.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The attributes of linear, homogeneous, continuous, isotropic materials and a semicontrolled mesh with high-order tetrahedral elements are commonly used in biomodelling and numerical analysis on biological tissues and organs.
“All these attributes are commonly used when performing biomodelling and numerical analysis on biological tissues and organs [22, 37, 43–50].”
From Numerical Analysis of the ACL, with Sprains of Different Degrees after Trauma (2021) · cites this paper as [45]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Numerical Analysis of the ACL, with Sprains of Different Degrees after Trauma
Marquet-Rivera, R. A., Urriolagoitia-Sosa, G., Romero-Ángeles, B., Hernández-Vázquez, R. A., Mastache-Miranda, O. A., Cruz-López, S., Torres-Yáñez, A., & Urriolagoitia-Calderón, G. (2021) · Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine · doi:10.1155/2021/2109348 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Hernández-Vázquez, R. A., Marquet-Rivera, R. A., Mastache-Miranda, O. A., Vázquez-López, A. J., Cruz-López, S., & Vázquez-Feijoo, J. A. (2021) · Applied Bionics and Biomechanics · doi:10.1155/2021/6658039 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- CICCI�, M.
- Venue
- Oral & Implantology
- Publisher
- Edikta s.r.l.
- Published
- 2014
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-10
- ISSN
- 1974-5648 (ISSN-L)
- 2035-2468
- PMC
- PMC4302741
- OpenAlex
- W2148177920
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 2.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Oral & Implantology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Dental materials and restorations
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
- Keywords
- masticatory load, load distribution, finite element analysis, von Mises stress, edentulous patients, implant-supported prostheses, bone quality, patient discomfort
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review