Cited by 62Dental Implant Techniques and OutcomesDental materials and restorationsOrthopaedic implants and arthroplasty

FEM and VonMises analyses of different dental implant shapes for masticatory loading distribution

Open access
CICCI�, M·2014·Oral & Implantology

Abstract

The rehabilitation of edentulous patients is today a challenge for the clinicians. The healthy of the hard and soft issue may be considered a fundamental element for having long-term results. The dental implant progresses about the predictable and safe results made this technique chosen from a large group of practitioners. However some problems related intra-operative and postoperative conditions may create discomfort on the patients and consequently to the clinician. The unfavourable results are often related to the bone tissue quality but sometime the dental implant shape and the prosthesis framework may undergo to technical difficulties. The purpose of this work is, through the use of appropriate FEM models, to analyse the effect of all these parameters in the construction of a prosthesis type "Toronto", evaluating all the surgical and prosthetic components in order to direct the choices made by the surgeon and to optimize the distribution of loads reducing the patient's discomfort and having a long term clinical success.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.11138/orl/2014.7.1.001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The attributes of linear, homogeneous, continuous, isotropic materials and a semicontrolled mesh with high-order tetrahedral elements are commonly used in biomodelling and numerical analysis on biological tissues and organs.

    “All these attributes are commonly used when performing biomodelling and numerical analysis on biological tissues and organs [22, 37, 43–50].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
CICCI�, M.
Venue
Oral & Implantology
Publisher
Edikta s.r.l.
Published
2014
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
1-10
ISSN
  • 1974-5648 (ISSN-L)
  • 2035-2468
OpenAlex
W2148177920
Cited by
62
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2
FWCI
2.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Oral & Implantology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Dental materials and restorations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
Keywords
masticatory load, load distribution, finite element analysis, von Mises stress, edentulous patients, implant-supported prostheses, bone quality, patient discomfort

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review