Cited by 5Archaeological Research and ProtectionArchaeological and Geological StudiesUrban Design and Spatial Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Cost Surface-Derived Least-Cost Paths: A Case Study from Iron Age Orkney

Open access
University of York, Rahn, Brian·2005·Internet Archaeology

Abstract

In recent years, GIS landscape models have begun to move towards more sophisticated techniques for representing the land surface in order to analyse site territories, pathways and travel costs. Many of the major commercial GIS packages now offer the ability to generate anisotropic cost surfaces. In addition, recent papers have proposed methodologies for generating cost surfaces to model social preferences affecting travel (Lee and Stucky 1998; Llobera 2000). Composite image of a broch and distribution map of Orkney In terms of practical applications, however, GIS models of catchment areas and paths between sites continue to be dominated by those constructed on the basis of slope alone. In parallel with this, regional analyses of site location, with few exceptions, have been undertaken either within large land masses, largely ignoring the effects of rivers, lakes and the sea on travel costs and affordances, or within single islands, neglecting travel to other neighbouring islands or the mainland. The reasons for this appear to be twofold: first, there is little information available on travel costs and travel rates using pre-industrial transportation technology, beyond very general statements; second, critical analysis of what constitutes an 'acceptable' travel distance is lacking, especially in situations where both water and land transport are possibilities. This article presents some preliminary results from a research project examining the location and distribution of Middle Iron Age sites (brochs) in the landscape of Orkney, Northern Scotland. It employs a terrain model, taking into account differing friction values for land and water surfaces, as well as the nature of the shoreline (cliffs, beaches) and how this affects access from land to sea and vice versa. It also attempts to model pathways between sites following three friction models: lowest-energy, lowest-visibility (hidden) and highest-visibility (exposed). Lee, J. and Stucky, D. 1998 'On applying viewshed analysis for determining least-cost paths on Digital Elevation Models', International Journal of Geographical Information Science 12, no. 8, 891-905. Llobera, M. 2000 'Understanding movement: a pilot model towards the sociology of movement', in G.R. Lock (ed) Beyond the Map: Archaeology and Spatial Technologies, IOS Press, Oxford, 65-84. Go to article Table of Contents Keywords * Orkney * Iron Age * Broch * Travel costs/rates * Least-cost pathways

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.11141/ia.19.2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Metadata

Authors
University of York, & Rahn, B.
Venue
Internet Archaeology
Published
2005
Issue
19
ISSN
1363-5387 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2326450361
Cited by
5
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-sa
Locations
  • Internet Archaeology (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Archeology › Archaeological Research and Protection
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Archaeological and Geological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban Design and Spatial Analysis
Keywords
least-cost path, cost surface, travel cost, Orkney, landscape archaeology, water transport, shoreline access, visibility analysis, site distribution, Middle Iron Age, catchment area

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review