The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Infant Skull and Suture Properties: Measurements and Implications for Mechanisms of Pediatric Brain Injury
Abstract
The mechanical properties of the adult human skull are well documented, but little information is available for the infant skull. To determine the age-dependent changes in skull properties, we tested human and porcine infant cranial bone in three-point bending. The measurement of elastic modulus in the human and porcine infant cranial bone agrees with and extends previous published data [McPherson, G. K., and Kriewall, T. J. (1980), J. Biomech., 13, pp. 9–16] for human infant cranial bone. After confirming that the porcine and human cranial bone properties were comparable, additional tensile and three-point bending studies were conducted on porcine cranial bone and suture. Comparisons of the porcine infant data with previously published adult human data demonstrate that the elastic modulus, ultimate stress, and energy absorbed to failure increase, and the ultimate strain decreases with age for cranial bone. Likewise, we conclude that the elastic modulus, ultimate stress, and energy absorbed to failure increase with age for sutures. We constructed two finite element models of an idealized one-month old infant head, one with pediatric and the other adult skull properties, and subjected them to impact loading to investigate the contribution of the cranial bone properties on the intracranial tissue deformation pattern. The computational simulations demonstrate that the comparatively compliant skull and membranous suture properties of the infant brain case are associated with large cranial shape changes, and a more diffuse pattern of brain distortion than when the skull takes on adult properties. These studies are a fundamental initial step in predicting the unique mechanical response of the pediatric skull to traumatic loads associated with head injury and, thus, for defining head injury thresholds for children. [S0148-0731(00)00904-3]
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Crowe, L. M., Catroppa, C., Babl, F. E., & Anderson, V. (2012) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.2011-0438 · Cited by 119
A 3D bioprinted cortical organoid platform for modeling human brain development
Cadena, M. A., Sing, A., Taylor, K., Jin, L., Ning, L., Salar Amoli, M., Singh, Y., Lanjewar, S. N., Tomov, M. L., Serpooshan, V., et al. (2024) · Advanced Healthcare Materials · doi:10.1002/adhm.202401603 · Cited by 39
Mercan, E., Hopper, R. A., & Maga, A. M. (2020) · Journal of Anatomy · doi:10.1111/joa.13085 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Margulies, S. S., & Thibault, K. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
- Publisher
- ASME International
- Published
- 2000-03-28
- Volume
- 122
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 364-371
- ISSN
- 0148-0731 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-8951
- OpenAlex
- W1983249739
- Cited by
- 306
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Infant Skull and Suture Properties: Measurements and Implications for Mechanisms of Pediatric Brain Injury. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1115/1.1287160
- The paper
- Margulies, S. S., & Thibault, K. L. (2000). Infant Skull and Suture Properties: Measurements and Implications for Mechanisms of Pediatric Brain Injury. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1287160
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.