The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Wavelet Analysis and Envelope Detection For Rolling Element Bearing Fault Diagnosis—Their Effectiveness and Flexibilities
Abstract
The components which often fail in a rolling element bearing are the outer-race, the inner-race, the rollers, and the cage. Such failures generate a series of impact vibrations in short time intervals, which occur at Bearing Characteristic Frequencies (BCF). Since BCF contain very little energy, and are usually overwhelmed by noise and higher levels of macro-structural vibrations, they are difficult to find in their frequency spectra when using the common technique of Fast Fourier Transforms (FFT). Therefore, Envelope Detection (ED) is always used with FFT to identify faults occurring at the BCF. However, the computation of ED is complicated, and requires expensive equipment and experienced operators to process. This, coupled with the incapacity of FFT to detect nonstationary signals, makes wavelet analysis a popular alternative for machine fault diagnosis. Wavelet analysis provides multi-resolution in time-frequency distribution for easier detection of abnormal vibration signals. From the results of extensive experiments performed in a series of motor-pump driven systems, the methods of wavelet analysis and FFT with ED are proven to be efficient in detecting some types of bearing faults. Since wavelet analysis can detect both periodic and nonperiodic signals, it allows the machine operator to more easily detect the remaining types of bearing faults which are impossible by the method of FFT with ED. Hence, wavelet analysis is a better fault diagnostic tool for the practice in maintenance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Peng, Z. K., Tse, P. W., & Chu, F. L. (2005) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2004.01.006 · Cited by 840
Self-citationDiez-Olivan, A., Del Ser, J., Galar, D., & Sierra, B. (2019) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2018.10.005 · Cited by 633
Deep residual learning-based fault diagnosis method for rotating machinery
Zhang, W., Li, X., & Ding, Q. (2019) · ISA Transactions · doi:10.1016/j.isatra.2018.12.025 · Cited by 416
A fault diagnosis approach for roller bearing based on IMF envelope spectrum and SVM
Yang, Y., Yu, D., & Cheng, J. (2007) · Measurement · doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2006.10.010 · Cited by 334
Van, M., & Kang, H.-J. (2016) · Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science · doi:10.1177/0954406215573976 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Tse, P. W., Peng, Y. H., & Yam, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Vibration and Acoustics
- Publisher
- ASME International
- Published
- 2001-03-01
- Volume
- 123
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 303-310
- ISSN
- 0739-3717 (ISSN-L)
- 1048-9002
- 1528-8927
- OpenAlex
- W2021909145
- Cited by
- 422
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Wavelet Analysis and Envelope Detection For Rolling Element Bearing Fault Diagnosis—Their Effectiveness and Flexibilities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1115/1.1379745
- The paper
- Tse, P. W., Peng, Y. H., & Yam, R. (2001). Wavelet Analysis and Envelope Detection For Rolling Element Bearing Fault Diagnosis—Their Effectiveness and Flexibilities. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1379745
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.