The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Target Cascading in Optimal System Design
Abstract
Target cascading is a key challenge in the early product development stages of large complex artifacts: how to propagate the desirable top level design specifications (or targets) to appropriate specifications for the various subsystems and components in a consistent and efficient manner. Consistency means that all parts of the designed system should work well together, while efficiency means that the process itself should avoid iterations at later stages, which are costly in time and resources. In the present article target cascading is formalized by a process modeled as a multilevel optimal design problem. Design targets are cascaded down to lower levels using partitioning of the original problem into a hierarchical set of subproblems. For each design problem at a given level, an optimization problem is formulated to minimize deviations from the propagated targets and thus achieve intersystem compatibility. A coordination strategy links all subproblem decisions so that the overall system performance targets are met. The process is illustrated with an explicit analytical problem and a simple automotive chassis design model that demonstrates how the process can be applied in practice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Numerical Methods for Unconstrained Optimization and Nonlinear Equations
Dennis, J. E., & Schnabel, R. B. (1996) · Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks · doi:10.1137/1.9781611971200 · Cited by 7,615
The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits
Hansen, M. T. (1999) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2667032 · Cited by 5,809
Tosi, H. L. (1991) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1991.4278976 · Cited by 4,145
Fundamentals of Vehicle Dynamics
Gillespie, T. (2021) · SAE International eBooks · doi:10.4271/9781468601770 · Cited by 2,515
Multiobjective Decision Making: Theory and Methodology
Chankong, V., & Haimes, Y. Y. (1983) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,371
The finite element method for engineers
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.32-5680 · Cited by 1,723
Quality Function Deployment : Integrating Customer Requirements into Product Design
Akao, Y. (1990) · Cited by 1,680
Beyond the chalkboard: computer support for collaboration and problem solving in meetings
Stefik, M., Foster, G., Bobrow, D. G., Kahn, K., Lanning, S., & Suchman, L. (1987) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/7885.7887 · Cited by 1,031
Problem Formulation for Multidisciplinary Optimization
Cramer, E. J., Dennis, Jr., Frank, P. D., Lewis, R. M., & Shubin, G. R. (1994) · SIAM Journal on Optimization · doi:10.1137/0804044 · Cited by 653
Principles of Optimal Design: Modeling and Computation
Papalambros, P. Y., & Wilde, D. J. (2000) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511626418 · Cited by 574
Self-citation
Cited by
Convergence Properties of Analytical Target Cascading
Michelena, N., Park, H., & Papalambros, P. Y. (2003) · AIAA Journal · doi:10.2514/2.2025 · Cited by 304
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, H. M., Michelena, N. F., Papalambros, P. Y., & Jiang, T.
- Venue
- Journal of Mechanical Design
- Publisher
- ASME International
- Published
- 2003-09-01
- Volume
- 125
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 474-480
- ISSN
- 0161-8458 (ISSN-L)
- 1050-0472
- 1528-9001
- OpenAlex
- W2158874658
- Cited by
- 616
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 62.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Target Cascading in Optimal System Design. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1115/1.1582501
- The paper
- Kim, H. M., Michelena, N. F., Papalambros, P. Y., & Jiang, T. (2003). Target Cascading in Optimal System Design. Journal of Mechanical Design. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1582501
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.