The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Problem Formulation for Multidisciplinary Optimization
Abstract
This paper is about multidisciplinary (design) optimization, or MDO, the coupling of two or more analysis disciplines with numerical optimization. The paper has three goals. First, it is an expository introduction to MDO aimed at those who do research on optimization algorithms, since the optimization community has much to contribute to this important class of computational engineering problems. Second, this paper presents to the MDO research community a new abstraction for multidisciplinary analysis and design problems as well as new decomposition formulations for these problems. Third, the “individual discipline feasible” (IDF) approaches introduced here make use of existing specialized analysis codes, and they introduce significant opportunities for coarse-grained computational parallelism particularly well suited to heterogeneous computing environments. The key distinguishing characteristic of the three fundamental approaches to MDO formulation discussed here is the kind of disciplinary feasibility that must be maintained at each optimization iteration. Other formulation issues, such as the sensitivities required, are also considered. This discussion highlights the trade-offs between reuse of existing software, computational requirements, and probability of success.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Target Cascading in Optimal System Design
Kim, H. M., Michelena, N. F., Papalambros, P. Y., & Jiang, T. (2003) · Journal of Mechanical Design · doi:10.1115/1.1582501 · Cited by 616
Data-Driven Aerospace Engineering: Reframing the Industry with Machine Learning
Brunton, S. L., Nathan Kutz, J., Manohar, K., Aravkin, A. Y., Morgansen, K., Klemisch, J., Goebel, N., Buttrick, J., Poskin, J., Blom-Schieber, A. W., et al. (2021) · AIAA Journal · doi:10.2514/1.j060131 · Cited by 270
Multidisciplinary Optimization in Conceptual Design of Mixed-Stream Turbofan Engines
Nadon, L. J. J. P., Kramer, S. C., & King, P. I. (1999) · Journal of Propulsion and Power · doi:10.2514/2.5412 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Cramer, E. J., Dennis, Jr., Frank, P. D., Lewis, R. M., & Shubin, G. R.
- Venue
- SIAM Journal on Optimization
- Published
- 1994-11
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 754-776
- ISSN
- 1052-6234 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-7189
- OpenAlex
- W2101549458
- Cited by
- 653
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Problem Formulation for Multidisciplinary Optimization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1137/0804044
- The paper
- Cramer, E. J., Dennis, Jr., Frank, P. D., Lewis, R. M., & Shubin, G. R. (1994). Problem Formulation for Multidisciplinary Optimization. SIAM Journal on Optimization. https://doi.org/10.1137/0804044
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.