Cited by 155Medical Image Segmentation TechniquesKnee injuries and reconstruction techniquesLower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies

Theoretical Accuracy of Model-Based Shape Matching for Measuring Natural Knee Kinematics with Single-Plane Fluoroscopy

Open access
Fregly, Benjamin J., Rahman, Haseeb A., Banks, Scott A.·2005·Journal of Biomechanical Engineering

Abstract

Quantification of knee motion under dynamic, in vivo loaded conditions is necessary to understand how knee kinematics influence joint injury, disease, and rehabilitation. Though recent studies have measured three-dimensional knee kinematics by matching geometric bone models to single-plane fluoroscopic images, factors limiting the accuracy of this approach have not been thoroughly investigated. This study used a three-step computational approach to evaluate theoretical accuracy limitations due to the shape matching process alone. First, cortical bone models of the femur tibia/fibula, and patella were created from CT data. Next, synthetic (i.e., computer generated) fluoroscopic images were created by ray tracing the bone models in known poses. Finally, an automated matching algorithm utilizing edge detection methods was developed to align flat-shaded bone models to the synthetic images. Accuracy of the recovered pose parameters was assessed in terms of measurement bias and precision. Under these ideal conditions where other sources of error were eliminated, tibiofemoral poses were within 2 mm for sagittal plane translations and 1.5 deg for all rotations while patellofemoral poses were within 2 mm and 3 deg. However, statistically significant bias was found in most relative pose parameters. Bias disappeared and precision improved by a factor of two when the synthetic images were regenerated using flat shading (i.e., sharp bone edges) instead of ray tracing (i.e., attenuated bon…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1115/1.1933949

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There are theoretical accuracy limitations in a shape-matching process during registration because the estimated femur may be positioned closer or further to the camera along the z-axis of the femoral ACS frame.

    “There are theoretical accuracy limitations in a shape-matching process during registration as the estimated femur may be positioned closer or further to the camera along the z-axis of the femoral ACS frame (Fregly et al. 2005).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fregly, B. J., Rahman, H. A., & Banks, S. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Florida (US)
  • University of Florida Health (US)
Corresponding author
Fregly, Benjamin J.
Venue
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
Published
2005-01-27
Volume
127
Issue
4
Pages
692-699
ISSN
  • 0148-0731 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-8951
OpenAlex
W2027135299
Cited by
155
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 14
FWCI
7.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • U.S. National Library of Medicine (R03LM007332)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
Keywords
knee kinematics, shape matching, model-based pose estimation, edge detection, measurement bias, measurement precision, tibiofemoral joint, patellofemoral joint, ray tracing
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Biomechanical Phenomena, Computer Simulation, Fluoroscopy, Humans, Knee Joint, Models, Anatomic, Models, Biological, Radiographic Image Enhancement, Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Range of Motion, Articular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review