The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Validation of Finite Element Predictions of Cartilage Contact Pressure in the Human Hip Joint
Open accessAbstract
Methods to predict contact stresses in the hip can provide an improved understanding of load distribution in the normal and pathologic joint. The objectives of this study were to develop and validate a three-dimensional finite element (FE) model for predicting cartilage contact stresses in the human hip using subject-specific geometry from computed tomography image data, and to assess the sensitivity of model predictions to boundary conditions, cartilage geometry, and cartilage material properties. Loads based on in vivo data were applied to a cadaveric hip joint to simulate walking, descending stairs, and stair-climbing. Contact pressures and areas were measured using pressure sensitive film. CT image data were segmented and discretized into FE meshes of bone and cartilage. FE boundary and loading conditions mimicked the experimental testing. Fair to good qualitative correspondence was obtained between FE predictions and experimental measurements for simulated walking and descending stairs, while excellent agreement was obtained for stair-climbing. Experimental peak pressures, average pressures, and contact areas were 10.0MPa (limit of film detection), 4.4–5.0MPa, and 321.9–425.1mm2, respectively, while FE-predicted peak pressures, average pressures, and contact areas were 10.8–12.7MPa, 5.1–6.2MPa, and 304.2–366.1mm2, respectively. Misalignment errors, determined as the difference in root mean squared error before and after alignment of FE results, were less than 10%. Magnitude errors, determined as the residual error following alignment, were approximately 30% but decreased to 10–15% when the regions of highest pressure were compared. Alterations to the cartilage shear modulus, bulk modulus, or thickness resulted in ±25% change in peak pressures, while changes in average pressures and contact areas were minor (±10%). When the pelvis and proximal femur were represented as rigid, there were large changes, but the effect depended on the particular loading scenario. Overall, the subject-specific FE predictions compared favorably with pressure film measurements and were in good agreement with published experimental data. The validated modeling framework provides a foundation for development of patient-specific FE models to investigate the mechanics of normal and pathological hips.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Patient-specific analysis of cartilage and labrum mechanics in human hips with acetabular dysplasia
Henak, C. R., Abraham, C. L., Anderson, A. E., Maas, S. A., Ellis, B. J., Peters, C. L., & Weiss, J. A. (2014) · Osteoarthritis and Cartilage · doi:10.1016/j.joca.2013.11.003 · Cited by 172
Self-citationNg, K. C. G., Lamontagne, M., Labrosse, M. R., & Beaulé, P. E. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0147813 · Cited by 54
Metadata
- Authors
- Anderson, A. E., Ellis, B. J., Maas, S. A., Peters, C. L., & Weiss, J. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
- Publisher
- ASME International
- Published
- 2008-07-14
- Volume
- 130
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 051008-051008
- ISSN
- 0148-0731 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-8951
- OpenAlex
- W2105604139
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.