The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Hydrodynamics of Stirred Bioreactors
Abstract
This review of the hydrodynamics of stirred bioreactors begins with an introduction to the agitation problems of particular concern in such systems. This is followed by a brief review of some basic concepts in turbulence and rheology of relevance to bioreactors. Important aspects of single phase mixing in low viscosity, high viscosity and Theologically complex broths are then covered in some detail including flow patterns, power number versus Reynolds number plots (including the modification of the latter to allow for shear thinning broths), flow numbers, energy dissipation rates and flow close to impellers and between multiple impeller systems. From these basic principles, the problem of homogenization is then covered in depth because of its significance for bioreactor performance. Aeration concepts are then introduced and the behavior of traditional Rushton turbine impellers is then treated in detail, covering the flow patterns, aerated power characteristics, mixing time and scale-up considerations. The weaknesses of the Rushton turbine are then discussed which leads into a section describing how more modern impellers are able to improve on many of these, especially emphasising their ability to introduce more energy dissipation into the broth and handle more air before flooding, both of which enhance oxygen transfer. The improvement in bulk blending found with multiple axial flow agitators is brought out too. Finally, the retrofitting of fermenters originally containing Rushton turbines with these more modern impellers is discussed. In conclusion, it is clear that there have been substantial increases in the understanding of stirred bioreactor hydrodynamics. However, whilst further understanding will occur within the framework discussed here, the expectation must be that computational fluid dynamics will increase in importance in spite of the difficulty of handling complex rheology, multiphase systems and biological responses. This review article has 135 references.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Reactor Engineering in Large Scale Animal Cell Culture
Nienow, A. W. (2006) · Cytotechnology · doi:10.1007/s10616-006-9005-8 · Cited by 433
Self-citationEffects of shear stress on microalgae- A Review
Wang, C., & Lan, C. Q. (2018) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.03.001 · Cited by 269
Scale‐up analysis for a CHO cell culture process in large‐scale bioreactors
Xing, Z., Kenty, B. M., Li, Z. J., & Lee, S. S. (2009) · Biotechnology and Bioengineering · doi:10.1002/bit.22287 · Cited by 228
The scale−up of microbial batch and fed−batch fermentation processes
Hewitt, C. J., & Nienow, A. W. (2007) · Advances in Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2164(07)62005-x · Cited by 162
Self-citationPhotobioreactor scale-up for a shear-sensitive dinoflagellate microalga
Camacho, F. G., Rodríguez, J. J. G., Mirón, A. S., Belarbi, E. H., Chisti, Y., & Grima, E. M. (2011) · Process Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.procbio.2011.01.005 · Cited by 72
Metadata
- Authors
- Nienow, A. W.
- Venue
- Applied Mechanics Reviews
- Publisher
- ASME International
- Published
- 1998-01-01
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-32
- ISSN
- 0003-6900 (ISSN-L)
- 2379-0407
- OpenAlex
- W1995376869
- Cited by
- 278
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hydrodynamics of Stirred Bioreactors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1115/1.3098990
- The paper
- Nienow, A. W. (1998). Hydrodynamics of Stirred Bioreactors. Applied Mechanics Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3098990
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.