The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Yield Behavior of Bovine Cancellous Bone
Abstract
The compressive yield strain was measured for 61 specimens of bovine cancellous bone from three distal femora. There was no significant relationship (p = 0.08, R2 = 0.051) between yield strain and the degree of trabecular orientation. There was a significant positive correlation (p<0.00001, R2 = 0.319) between yield strain and structural (apparent) density and significant negative correlation (p<0.0025, R2 = 0.145) between yield strain and bone density. Yield strain correlated best with bone solid volume fraction Vv (εy = 0.592 + 1.446vv, R2 = 0.337). The quantity, yield strain, is highly dependent on specific definitions of the yield point and the point of zero strain. For this study the yield point was defined by a 0.0003 offset criterion, and the point of zero strain was defined as the point where the tangent at 15 percent of yield crosses zero. The results using these definitions were compared with results using yield strain values determined by other definitions of the yield point and zero strain. The correlations between yield strain and trabecular orientation, structural density and bone density changed very little for differing definitions of yield. The results suggest that yield strain in cancellous bone is isotropic or independent of textural anisotropy, so the yield behavior may be characterized by a maximum strain yield criterion. The results also suggest that the primary mode of yield in cancellous bone is buckling of the trabeculae.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Ultimate strains in trabecular bone also appear to be isotropic and range from 1.0% to 2.5% (97, 99), whereas yield strains range from 0.70% to 0.77% in compression and from 0.65% to 0.71% in tension (82).”
From Bone Mechanical Properties in Healthy and Diseased States (2018) · cites this paper as [99]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bone Mechanical Properties in Healthy and Diseased States
Morgan, E. F., Unnikrisnan, G. U., & Hussein, A. I. (2018) · Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev-bioeng-062117-121139 · Cited by 1,026
“5% (97, 99), whereas yield strains range from 0.”
Biomechanics of Trabecular Bone
Keaveny, T. M., Morgan, E. F., Niebur, G. L., & Yeh, O. C. (2001) · Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev.bioeng.3.1.307 · Cited by 807
“2% offset) yield strains for bovine trabecular bone are higher in compression than tension (67, 71), and even more interesting, the yield strains are isotropic (75, 76).”
Three-dimensional methods for quantification of cancellous bone architecture
Odgaard, A. (1997) · Bone · doi:10.1016/s8756-3282(97)00007-0 · Cited by 781
Dependence of yield strain of human trabecular bone on anatomic site
Morgan, E. F., & Keaveny, T. M. (2001) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/s0021-9290(01)00011-2 · Cited by 705
“Experiments on bovine tibial bone indicate that yield strains are independent of density (Keaveny et al., 1994b; Turner, 1989) and are isotropic (Chang et al.”
BackgroundInfluentialYield strain behavior of trabecular bone
Kopperdahl, D. L., & Keaveny, T. M. (1998) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/s0021-9290(98)00057-8 · Cited by 654
“Cellular solid analysis (Gibson and Ashby, 1988; Turner, 1989) also suggests that the relationship between yield strain and apparent density can vary from a positive linear correlation, when failure is dominated by buckling of trabeculae aligned with the applied load, to a negative correlation due…”
BackgroundInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Turner, C. H.
- Affiliations
- Tulane University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Turner, C. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
- Publisher
- ASME International
- Published
- 1989-08-01
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 256-260
- ISSN
- 0148-0731 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-8951
- OpenAlex
- W2082479185
- Cited by
- 127
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 1.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Biomechanical Engineering (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Public Health Service
- National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (DE 06859)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone fractures and treatments
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Elasticity and Material Modeling
- Keywords
- trabecular bone, yield strain, trabecular orientation, bone mineral density, solid volume fraction, yield criterion, distal femur, bovine bone
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Bone and Bones, Cattle, Compliance, Densitometry, Femur, Models, Biological, Stress, Mechanical
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review