Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 335

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Friction—The Present State of Our Understanding

Tabor, David·1981·Journal of Lubrication Technology

Abstract

This paper presents a general critical picture of our present understanding of the frictional process. In particular it emphasizes the three main elements involved, namely the true area of contact, the nature and strength of the inerfacial bonds formed at the regions of contact, and the way in which the material around the contacting regions is sheared and ruptured during sliding. Most of the paper deals with metals but reference is also made to ceramics, lamellar solids, polymers, and elastomers. The paper concludes with a discussion of areas where further progress is desirable.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1115/1.3251622

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 335

Metadata

Authors
Tabor, D.
Venue
Journal of Lubrication Technology
Published
1981-04-01
Volume
103
Issue
2
Pages
169-179
ISSN
0022-2305 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1901686099
Cited by
335
References
0
FWCI
8.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Friction—The Present State of Our Understanding. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1115/1.3251622
The paper
Tabor, D. (1981). Friction—The Present State of Our Understanding. Journal of Lubrication Technology. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3251622

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.