Cited by 16Advanced MEMS and NEMS TechnologiesGas Dynamics and Kinetic TheoryHeat Transfer and Optimization

Raman Thermometry Measurements and Thermal Simulations for MEMS Bridges at Pressures From 0.05 Torr to 625 Torr

Phinney, Leslie M., Serrano, Justin R., Piekos, Edward S., Torczynski, John R., Gallis, Michael A., Gorby, Allen D.·2010·Journal of Heat Transfer

Abstract

This paper reports on experimental and computational investigations into the thermal performance of microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) as a function of the pressure of the surrounding gas. High spatial resolution Raman thermometry was used to measure the temperature profiles on electrically heated, polycrystalline silicon bridges that are nominally 10 μm wide, 2.25 μm thick, and either 200 μm or 400 μm long in nitrogen atmospheres with pressures ranging from 0.05 Torr to 625 Torr (6.67 Pa–83.3 kPa). Finite element modeling of the thermal behavior of the MEMS bridges is performed and compared with the experimental results. Noncontinuum gas effects are incorporated into the continuum finite element model by imposing temperature discontinuities at gas-solid interfaces that are determined from noncontinuum simulations. The results indicate that gas-phase heat transfer is significant for devices of this size at ambient pressures but becomes minimal as the pressure is reduced below 5 Torr. The model and experimental results are in qualitative agreement, and better quantitative agreement requires increased accuracy in the geometrical and material property values.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1115/1.4000965

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Electrical resistance thermometry has been applied to measure the thermal conductivity of low-dimensional solids in both direct and modulated current configurations.

    “Electrical resistance thermometry has been applied to measure the thermal conductivity of low dimensional solids (films, membranes, wires, and bridges) [13-15] in both direct [16-20] and modulated (1-omega, 2-omega, 3-omega) [21,22] current configurations.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Phinney, L. M., Serrano, J. R., Piekos, E. S., Torczynski, J. R., Gallis, M. A., & Gorby, A. D.
Affiliations
Sandia National Laboratories (US)
Venue
Journal of Heat Transfer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-04-28
Volume
132
Issue
7
ISSN
  • 0022-1481 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-8943
OpenAlex
W2051751976
Cited by
16
References
1
Citations by year
2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ASME Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Nuclear Security Administration
  • Sandia National Laboratories
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Gas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Heat Transfer and Optimization
Keywords
Raman thermometry, gas pressure effects, polycrystalline silicon, nitrogen atmosphere, thermal simulation, finite element analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review