Raman Thermometry Measurements and Thermal Simulations for MEMS Bridges at Pressures From 0.05 Torr to 625 Torr
Abstract
This paper reports on experimental and computational investigations into the thermal performance of microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) as a function of the pressure of the surrounding gas. High spatial resolution Raman thermometry was used to measure the temperature profiles on electrically heated, polycrystalline silicon bridges that are nominally 10 μm wide, 2.25 μm thick, and either 200 μm or 400 μm long in nitrogen atmospheres with pressures ranging from 0.05 Torr to 625 Torr (6.67 Pa–83.3 kPa). Finite element modeling of the thermal behavior of the MEMS bridges is performed and compared with the experimental results. Noncontinuum gas effects are incorporated into the continuum finite element model by imposing temperature discontinuities at gas-solid interfaces that are determined from noncontinuum simulations. The results indicate that gas-phase heat transfer is significant for devices of this size at ambient pressures but becomes minimal as the pressure is reduced below 5 Torr. The model and experimental results are in qualitative agreement, and better quantitative agreement requires increased accuracy in the geometrical and material property values.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Electrical resistance thermometry has been applied to measure the thermal conductivity of low-dimensional solids in both direct and modulated current configurations.
“Electrical resistance thermometry has been applied to measure the thermal conductivity of low dimensional solids (films, membranes, wires, and bridges) [13-15] in both direct [16-20] and modulated (1-omega, 2-omega, 3-omega) [21,22] current configurations.”
From Mean Free Path Effects on the Experimentally Measured Thermal Conductivity of Single-Crystal Silicon Microbridges (2013) · cites this paper as [20]
Cites
Beechem, T., Graham, S., Kearney, S. P., Phinney, L. M., & Serrano, J. R. (2007) · Review of Scientific Instruments · doi:10.1063/1.2738946 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
English, T. S., Phinney, L. M., Hopkins, P. E., & Serrano, J. R. (2013) · Journal of Heat Transfer · doi:10.1115/1.4024357 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Phinney, L. M., Serrano, J. R., Piekos, E. S., Torczynski, J. R., Gallis, M. A., & Gorby, A. D.
- Affiliations
- Sandia National Laboratories (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Heat Transfer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-04-28
- Volume
- 132
- Issue
- 7
- ISSN
- 0022-1481 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-8943
- OpenAlex
- W2051751976
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 2.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ASME Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Nuclear Security Administration
- Sandia National Laboratories
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Gas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Heat Transfer and Optimization
- Keywords
- Raman thermometry, gas pressure effects, polycrystalline silicon, nitrogen atmosphere, thermal simulation, finite element analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review