Characterizing Effects of the Shape of Screw Conveyors in Gas–Solid Fluidized Beds Using Advanced Numerical Models
Abstract
A numerical study of the effects of the shape of an enclosed screw conveyor on the mixing and heat transfer in a horizontal gas–solid fluidized bed was conducted using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). A two-fluid model (TFM) was employed to model the gas and solid phases as continua through mass, momentum, and energy conservations. The motion of the screw conveyor was simulated by using a rotating reference frame (RRF) such that the computational mesh was free from dynamic reconstruction. The diameters of the screw flight and shaft, the pitch, and the blade thickness were varied in the parametric study. Under the operating conditions studied, it was found that the increase in the diameter of the screw flight results in the enhancement of the solid mixing and conveyance. The increase in the diameters of the screw shaft and the screw blade thickness lead to the enhanced solid mixing but reduced conveyance. The variation in the screw pitch gives rise to rather complex behaviors in the solid mixing and conveyance. As the screw pitch is decreased, the solid mixing increases initially but then decreases before it increases eventually. The solid conveyance capability was found to first increase and then decrease. Explanations to the effects of the shape of the screw conveyor were discussed in this work.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Multifluid models in CFD have been used to solve mass, momentum, energy, and species conservation equations in multiphase flow [19-21].
“With the development of the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) capabilities, the multifluid models in CFD have been used to solve mass, momentum, energy, and species conservation equations in multiphase flow [19-21].”
From Numerical Simulation of Frosting on Fin-and-Tube Heat Exchanger Surfaces (2017) · cites this paper as [20]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Numerical Simulation of Frosting on Fin-and-Tube Heat Exchanger Surfaces
Wu, X., Ma, Q., & Chu, F. (2017) · Journal of Thermal Science and Engineering Applications · doi:10.1115/1.4035925 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
- Authors
- Xiong, Q., Aramideh, S., Passalacqua, A., & Kong, S.-C.
- Affiliations
- Iowa State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kong, Song-Charng
- Venue
- Journal of Heat Transfer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-06-01
- Volume
- 137
- Issue
- 6
- ISSN
- 0022-1481 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-8943
- OpenAlex
- W1986308565
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 10.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ASME Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Bioeconomy Institute, Iowa State University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Granular flow and fluidized beds
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Heat and Mass Transfer in Porous Media
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
- Keywords
- screw conveyor, gas-solid fluidized bed, solids mixing, heat transfer, rotating frame, two-fluid model, screw pitch, blade thickness, shaft diameter
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review