Cited by 42Heat Transfer and OptimizationRefrigeration and Air Conditioning TechnologiesIcing and De-icing Technologies

Numerical Simulation of Frosting on Fin-and-Tube Heat Exchanger Surfaces

Wu, Xiaomin, Ma, Qiang, Chu, Fuqiang·2017·Journal of Thermal Science and Engineering Applications

Abstract

Frost on heat exchanger fin surfaces increases the thermal resistance and blocks the air flow passages, which both reduce the system energy efficiency. Therefore, investigations of frost formation, especially simulations of frosting on the heat exchanger surfaces are essential for designing heat exchangers that operate with frosting. In this paper, the frost growth and densification processes on fin-and-tube heat exchanger surfaces are numerically investigated using a mass transfer model implemented as a UDF in FLUENT. The model predicts the frost distributions on the heat exchanger surfaces, the temperature distributions and the air flow pressure drop. The results show that the frost is thicker and the frost density is higher on the fin surfaces on the windward side near the tubes while the frost is thinner and the density is lower near the inlet. Very little frost appears in the tube wake region. Frost on the fin-and-tube heat exchanger surfaces restricts the airflow and about doubles the pressure drop after frosting for 50 min. The simulated frost distributions and pressure drops are in good agreement with experimental data, which means that the frosting model can be used to predict frost layer growth on heat exchanger surfaces and predict the resulting airflow resistance.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

A CFD frosting model coupled to Euler multiphase flow predicts frost growth and densification on fin-and-tube heat exchanger surfaces, showing thicker/denser frost near tubes on the windward side and little frost in tube wakes. Frost roughly doubles air-side pressure drop after 50 min, with simulated pressure drops within 12.5% average relative error of measurements.

Key findings

  • Frost is thicker and denser on fin surfaces on the windward side near the tubes, while it is thinner and lower density near the inlet; very little frost appears in the tube wake region. Frost first appears on the tube wall where the fin attaches, and frost thickness and density increase with time.
  • Air velocity is close to zero in the tube wake; velocities increase as the frost layer grows and the wake expands. The maximum velocity in the flow passage is 4.3 m/s after frosting for 50 min, versus 2.8 m/s before frosting.
  • The simulated pressure drop is 8.8 Pa before frosting and 18.7 Pa after frosting for 50 min; measured pressure drop is 10.8 Pa before and 20.0 Pa after, giving an average relative error of 12.5%. Frost on the heat exchanger surfaces about doubles the pressure drop.
  • The simulated frost distribution on the fin surface agrees well with experimental observations; the water vapor mass fraction is approximately 0.25% downwind of the tubes after 50 min of frosting.

Methods

  • Numerical simulation using the mass transfer model of Wu et al. implemented as a user-defined function (UDF) in FLUENT; the Euler multiphase flow model treats humid air as the primary phase and ice as the secondary phase, with governing equations solved separately for the humid air domain and aluminum fin domain and coupled by temperature.
  • Geometry: two rows of circular tubes staggered in a regular triangular arrangement; aluminum fins and copper tubes. Structural parameters include tube pitch 22.00 mm, outer tube diameter 8.00 mm, tube wall thickness 0.15 mm, fin length 38.10 mm, fin pitch 1.50 mm, and fin thickness 0.11 mm. Simulation conditions: tube wall temperature −5 °C, frontal air temperature 2 °C, relative humidity 85%, air velocity 1.0 m/s, and frosting time 50 min.
  • Discretization used the QUICK solver with SIMPLE pressure–velocity coupling, a time step of 0.5 s, and convergence criteria of 10⁻⁶ relative error; grid independence tests were performed, and results were validated against experimental frost distribution and pressure drop.

Limitations

  • The paper does not include a dedicated limitations section; it states simplifying assumptions: constant outside tube surface temperature, incompressible Newtonian humid air, neglected thermal radiation, motionless ice with neglected convection heat transfer in the frost layer, and neglected frost sublimation and melting.
  • Evident from the text: validation is limited to visual frost distribution and pressure drop at one operating condition, with no quantitative comparison of predicted frost thickness or density against measurements reported. The simplified two-row geometry and symmetry-based computational domain may also limit generality.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1115/1.4035925

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

6 of 33 cited sources checked · 4 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation
    § 3 Mathematical Model and Numerical Method · p. 3

    The mass transfer driving force from water vapor to ice is the difference between water vapor partial pressure in the humid air (a function of water vapor concentration) and water vapor saturation pressure corresponding to the frost surface temperature [3,7].

    “The mass transfer driving force from the water vapor to the ice is the difference between the water vapor partial pressure in the humid air which is a function of water vapor concentration and the water vapor saturation pressure corresponding to the frost surface temperature [3,7].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [3] 2007, Visual and Theoretical Analyses of the Early Stage of Frost Formation on Cold Surfaces, J. Enhanced Heat Transfer source
    • cites [7] 2004, New Model for Frost Growth Rate, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer source

      Section 2, p. 2 supports a concentration difference between the air and frost surface as the driving force for water-vapor transfer. But the introduction (p. 1) explicitly rejects treating vapor at the frost surface as saturated, and Section 2.3 (p. 4) calculates its pressure using supersaturation. The claimed saturation-pressure value for the frost surface is therefore not supported by this paper. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingown data
    § Numerical Simulation of Frosting on Fin-and-Tube Heat Exchanger Surfaces · p. 1

    Simulated frost distributions and pressure drops are in good agreement with experimental data.

    “The simulated frost distributions and pressure drops are in good agreement with experimental data, which means that the frosting model can be used to predict frost layer growth on heat exchanger surfaces and the resulting airflow resistance.”
    • Also stated in: § 5 Conclusions · p. 6 · boosted
      “The frost distribution on the fin surface agrees well with experimental observations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingreasoning
    § Numerical Simulation of Frosting on Fin-and-Tube Heat Exchanger Surfaces · p. 1

    Very little frost appears in the tube wake region.

    “Very little frost appears in the tube wake region.”
    • Also stated in: § 4 Results and Discussion · p. 5 · plain
      “Figure 8 also shows very little frost downwind of the tubes.”
    • Also stated in: § 5 Conclusions · p. 6 · plain
      “Very little frost appears in the tube wake region because of the low water vapor concentration there.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingreasoning
    § 4 Results and Discussion · p. 4

    The highest fin temperature is far from the tubes on the left where the hot air flow enters.

    “The highest fin temperature is far from the tubes on the left where the hot air flow enters.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingreasoning
    § 4 Results and Discussion · p. 4

    In the simulation, the fin temperature near the tubes is relatively low because the tube wall was a constant temperature cooling surface.

    “In the simulation, the tube wall was a constant temperature cooling surface; therefore, the fin temperature near the tubes is relatively low.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 17
  • May combine two claims. 25
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Numerical Simulation of Frosting on Fin-and-Tube Heat Exchanger Surfaces · p. 1

    Lee and Ro [10] modeled the air gaps in the frost as cylindrical capillary tubes to model water vapor diffusion in the frost layer.

    “Lee and Ro [10] modeled the air gaps in the frost as cylindrical capillary tubes to model the water vapor diffusion in the frost layer.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [10] 2005, Analysis of the Frost Growth on a Flat Plate by Simple Models of Saturation and Supersaturation, Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given
    § Numerical Simulation of Frosting on Fin-and-Tube Heat Exchanger Surfaces · p. 1

    The calculation method proposed by O'Neal and Tree [6] was improved by Webb and coworker [7], Lee et al. [8], and Yao et al. [9].

    “The calculation method proposed by O'Neal and Tree [6] was improved by Webb and coworker [7], Lee et al. [8], and Yao et al. [9].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [6] 1984, Measurement of Frost Growth and Density in a Parallel Plate Geometry, ASHRAE Trans.

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [7] 2004, New Model for Frost Growth Rate, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer source

      The Abstract (p. 1) and Conclusions (p. 11) describe Na and Webb’s new frost-growth model and its improved thermal-conductivity correlation. But the discussion on p. 2 identifies O’Neal and Tree as authors of a review of thermal-conductivity correlations, not as proposers of the calculation method that Na and Webb improved. The cited paper therefore supports the improvement, but not the claimed lineage from O’Neal and Tree. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [8] 2003, Prediction of the Frost Formation on a Cold Flat Surface, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Numerical Simulation of Frosting on Fin-and-Tube Heat Exchanger Surfaces · p. 1

    Kandula [13] incorporated empirical correlations for frost density and effective thermal conductivity applicable for a wide range of frost circumstances.

    “Kandula [13] incorporated empirical correlations for the frost density and the effective thermal conductivity, which were applicable for a wide range of frost circumstances.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [13] 2011, Frost Growth and Densification in Laminar Flow Over Flat Surfaces, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Numerical Simulation of Frosting on Fin-and-Tube Heat Exchanger Surfaces · p. 1

    The model of Lee et al. [11] assumed that the humid air was saturated at the frost surface, while Webb and coworker [7,12] assumed that the humid air was supersaturated at the frost surface.

    “The model assumed that the humid air was saturated at the frost surface, while Webb and coworker [7,12] assumed that the humid air was supersaturated at the frost surface.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [11] 1997, A One-Dimensional Model for Frost Formation on a Cold Flat Surface, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer source
    • cites [7] 2004, New Model for Frost Growth Rate, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer source
    • cites [12] 2004, Mass Transfer On and Within a Frost Layer, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Numerical Simulation of Frosting on Fin-and-Tube Heat Exchanger Surfaces · p. 1

    Wu et al. [5] assumed that the driving force for water vapor condensation into ice was the difference between water vapor partial pressure in the humid air and water vapor saturation pressure corresponding to the frost surface temperature, related to vapor concentration difference [3,5,7].

    “They assumed that the driving force for the water vapor condensation into ice was the difference between the water vapor partial pressure in the humid air and the water vapor saturation pressure corresponding to the frost surface temperature, which was related to the vapor concentration difference [3,5,7].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [3] 2007, Visual and Theoretical Analyses of the Early Stage of Frost Formation on Cold Surfaces, J. Enhanced Heat Transfer source
    • cites [5] 2016, Phase Change Mass Transfer Model for Frost Growth and Densification, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer source
    • cites [7] 2004, New Model for Frost Growth Rate, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Numerical Simulation of Frosting on Fin-and-Tube Heat Exchanger Surfaces · p. 1

    The model predicts frost distributions on heat exchanger surfaces, temperature distributions, and air flow pressure drop.

    “The model predicts the frost distributions on the heat exchanger surfaces, the temperature distributions, and the air flow pressure drop.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § Numerical Simulation of Frosting on Fin-and-Tube Heat Exchanger Surfaces · p. 1

    Frost is thicker and frost density is higher on fin surfaces on the windward side near the tubes, while frost is thinner and density is lower near the inlet.

    “The results show that the frost is thicker and the frost density is higher on the fin surfaces on the windward side near the tubes, while the frost is thinner and the density is lower near the inlet.”
    • Also stated in: § 4 Results and Discussion · p. 5 · plain
      “Figure 8 shows that the frost density is higher near the tubes on the windward side and lower near the inlet.”
    • Also stated in: § 5 Conclusions · p. 6 · plain
      “The frost is thicker and the frost density is higher on the fin surface on the windward side near the tubes, while the frost is thinner and the density is lower near the inlet.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Numerical Simulation of Frosting on Fin-and-Tube Heat Exchanger Surfaces · p. 1

    Frost on fin-and-tube heat exchanger surfaces restricts airflow and about doubles the pressure drop after frosting for 50 min.

    “Frost on the fin-and-tube heat exchanger surfaces restricts the airflow and about doubles the pressure drop after frosting for 50 min.”
    • Also stated in: § 5 Conclusions · p. 6 · plain
      “The frost on the fin-and-tube heat exchanger surfaces restricts the airflow and the pressure drop is about doubled for a frosting time of 50 min.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 4 Results and Discussion · p. 4

    The frost layer growth process is affected by the flow field of the humid air, and the humid air flow field changes due to frost on the tubes.

    “The frost layer growth process is affected by the flow field of the humid air. On the other hand, the humid air flow field changes due to the frost on the tubes as shown in Fig. 5.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § 4 Results and Discussion · p. 4

    The air temperature decreases along the flow direction because of the cold tubes and fin, and is lowest downwind of the tubes.

    “The air temperature decreases along the flow direction because of the cold tubes and fin. The air temperature is then lowest downwind of the tubes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 4 Results and Discussion · p. 4

    There is very little humid air flow just downwind of the tubes and the low velocity area expands after frost appears on the tubes.

    “The streamlines show that there is very little humid air flow just downwind of the tubes and that the low velocity area expands after the frost appears on the tubes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § 4 Results and Discussion · p. 5

    The velocities in the core are higher after frosting as the flow region becomes smaller due to frost growth on the fins, which creates a larger wake region.

    “The velocities in the core are higher after frosting as the flow region becomes smaller due to the frost growth on the fins, which creates a larger wake region.”
    • Also stated in: § 5 Conclusions · p. 6 · plain
      “The velocities increase as the frost layer grows and the wake expands.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 4 Results and Discussion · p. 5

    There is very little humid air flow in the wake behind the tubes and water vapor motion there mostly depends on diffusion, so water vapor concentration is relatively low.

    “As shown in Fig. 5, there is very little humid air flow in the wake behind the tubes and the water vapor motion there mostly depends on diffusion so the water vapor concentration is relatively low.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § 4 Results and Discussion · p. 5

    The maximum velocity in the flow passage is 4.3 m/s after frosting for 50 min, but just 2.8 m/s before frosting.

    “The maximum velocity in the flow passage is 4.3 m/s after frosting for 50 min, but just 2.8 m/s before frosting.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 4 Results and Discussion · p. 6

    The measured pressure drop before frosting was 10.8 Pa and after frosting was 20.0 Pa.

    “The measured pressure drop before frosting was 10.8 Pa and after frosting was 20.0 Pa.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 4 Results and Discussion · p. 6

    The overall pressure drop before frosting is 8.8 Pa and after frosting is 18.7 Pa in the simulations.

    “The simulations show that the overall pressure drop before frosting is 8.8 Pa and after frosting is 18.7 Pa.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 4 Results and Discussion · p. 6

    The frost thickness on the tube wall and on the fin surface increases with time.

    “The frost thickness on the tube wall and on the fin surface increases with time.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 4 Results and Discussion · p. 5

    The water vapor motion on the downwind side is mostly by diffusion, so water vapor concentration there is relatively low.

    “The water vapor motion on the downwind side is mostly by diffusion; so, the water vapor concentration there is relatively low as shown in Fig. 7.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § 5 Conclusions · p. 6

    Both fin temperature and humid air temperature are lower near the tubes, with the highest air temperature far from the tubes and the fin at the flow passage inlet.

    “Both the fin temperature and the humid air temperature are lower near the tubes with the highest air temperature far from the tubes and the fin at the flow passage inlet.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Numerical Simulation of Frosting on Fin-and-Tube Heat Exchanger Surfaces · p. 1

    Multifluid models in CFD have been used to solve mass, momentum, energy, and species conservation equations in multiphase flow [19-21].

    “With the development of the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) capabilities, the multifluid models in CFD have been used to solve mass, momentum, energy, and species conservation equations in multiphase flow [19-21].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [19] 2013, Development of a Generalized Numerical Framework for Simulating Biomass Fast Pyrolysis in Fluidized-Bed Reactors, Chem. Eng. Sci. source
    • cites [20] 2015, Characterizing Effects of the Shape of Screw Conveyors in Gas–Solid Fluidized Beds Using Advanced Numerical Models, ASME J. Heat Transfer source
    • cites [21] 2014, Modeling Effects of Interphase Transport Coefficients on Biomass Pyrolysis in Fluidized Beds, Powder Technol. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Numerical Simulation of Frosting on Fin-and-Tube Heat Exchanger Surfaces · p. 1

    O'Neal and Tree [6] modeled frost as a porous media consisting of ice crystals and air gaps.

    “O'Neal and Tree [6] modeled frost as a porous media consisting of ice crystals and air gaps.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [6] 1984, Measurement of Frost Growth and Density in a Parallel Plate Geometry, ASHRAE Trans.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisenone given
    § Numerical Simulation of Frosting on Fin-and-Tube Heat Exchanger Surfaces · p. 1

    Accurate predictions of the mass transfer rate from water vapor in the air to ice are important in frosting simulation.

    “Accurate predictions of the mass transfer rate from the water vapor in the air to the ice are important in frosting simulation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning
    § Numerical Simulation of Frosting on Fin-and-Tube Heat Exchanger Surfaces · p. 1

    Previous frosting models did not take the interaction between the humid air flow field change and the frost layer growth into consideration, so they may not be used to simulate frost layer growth on complicated structure surfaces.

    “However, these models did not take the interaction between the humid air flow field change and the frost layer growth into consideration. Thus, these models may not be used to simulate the frost layer growth on complicated structure surfaces.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § Numerical Simulation of Frosting on Fin-and-Tube Heat Exchanger Surfaces · p. 2

    The mass transfer model proposed by Wu et al. [5] is more reasonable and can better reflect the frosting mechanism, making it suitable for simulating frost formation on complicated structure surfaces such as heat exchanger surfaces.

    “Since the mass transfer model proposed by Wu et al. [5] is more reasonable and can better reflect the frosting mechanism, it is suitable for simulating frost formation on complicated structure surfaces, such as heat exchanger surfaces.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [5] 2016, Phase Change Mass Transfer Model for Frost Growth and Densification, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Numerical Simulation of Frosting on Fin-and-Tube Heat Exchanger Surfaces · p. 1

    Lee et al. [11] presented a model that only considered the frost layer when calculating frost formation on a cold flat surface.

    “Lee et al. [11] presented a model that only considered the frost layer when calculating the frost formation on a cold flat surface.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [11] 1997, A One-Dimensional Model for Frost Formation on a Cold Flat Surface, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 3 Mathematical Model and Numerical Method · p. 4

    The air flow passage was gradually blocked with increasing frost layer thickness, which increased air velocity and reduced boundary layer thickness; therefore, the air velocity gradient in the boundary layer increased and the frost layer thickness growth rate slowed.

    “In addition, the air flow passage was gradually blocked with the increasing frost layer thickness, which increased the air velocity and reduced the boundary layer thickness. Therefore, the air velocity gradient in the boundary layer increased and the frost layer thickness growth rate slowed.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given
    § Numerical Simulation of Frosting on Fin-and-Tube Heat Exchanger Surfaces · p. 1

    These coupled models considered both the frost layer region and the humid air region without interface conditions with the same governing equations for both regions.

    “These models considered both the frost layer region and the humid air region without interface conditions with the same governing equations for both regions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data
    § 2 Physical Model · p. 2

    After grid independence tests, the cell size in the humid air domain was chosen as D x = 0.05 mm, D y = 0.05 mm, and D z = 0.05 mm near the tubes and D x = 0.3-0.5 mm, D y = 0.3-0.5 mm, and D z = 0.05 mm for the rest of the domain.

    “After grid independence tests, the cell size in the humid air domain was chosen as D x ¼ 0.05 mm, D y ¼ 0.05 mm, and D z ¼ 0.05 mm near the tubes and D x ¼ 0.3-0.5 mm, D y ¼ 0.3-0.5 mm, and D z ¼ 0.05 mm for the rest of the domain.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Numerical Simulation of Frosting on Fin-and-Tube Heat Exchanger Surfaces · p. 1

    Wu et al. [5] proposed a phase change mass transfer model for frost layer growth and densification.

    “Wu et al. [5] proposed a phase change mass transfer model for frost layer growth and densification.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [5] 2016, Phase Change Mass Transfer Model for Frost Growth and Densification, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Numerical Simulation of Frosting on Fin-and-Tube Heat Exchanger Surfaces · p. 1

    Kim et al. [23] assumed that mass transfer at the frost surface occurs due to the water vapor concentration gradient and used the mass transfer rate per unit volume as a volumetric source or sink term to describe mass transfer.

    “Kim et al. [23] assumed that the mass transfer at the frost surface occurs due to the water vapor concentration gradient and used the mass transfer rate per unit volume as a volumetric source or sink term to describe the mass transfer.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [23] 2015, Frosting Model for Predicting Macroscopic and Local Frost Behaviors on a Cold Plate, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Numerical Simulation of Frosting on Fin-and-Tube Heat Exchanger Surfaces · p. 1

    Cui et al. [22,24] proposed a frost mass transfer model based on nucleation theory to model the frosting process on flat plates and fin-and-tube heat exchangers.

    “Cui et al. [22,24] proposed a frost mass transfer model based on nucleation theory to model the frosting process on flat plates and fin-and-tube heat exchangers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [22] 2011, A New Time- and Space-Dependent Model for Predicting Frost Formation, Appl. Therm. Eng. source
    • cites [24] 2011, A New Model for Predicting Performance of Fin-and-Tube Heat Exchanger Under Frost Condition, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Numerical Simulation of Frosting on Fin-and-Tube Heat Exchanger Surfaces · p. 1

    Kim et al.'s [23] simulations calculated the frost layer density and thickness separately starting from an initial frost layer.

    “Their simulations calculated the frost layer density and thickness separately starting from an initial frost layer.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [23] 2015, Frosting Model for Predicting Macroscopic and Local Frost Behaviors on a Cold Plate, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § 2 Physical Model · p. 2

    Frost will grow on fin-and-tube heat exchanger surfaces when fin and tube surface temperatures are below zero and below the dew point of the air.

    “Frost will grow on the fin-and-tube heat exchanger surfaces when the fin and tube surface temperatures are below zero and below the dew point of the air.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 3 Mathematical Model and Numerical Method · p. 4

    In the humid air flow region, the air velocity was relatively large, so Y_v - Y_vs <= B u_a was satisfied and no frost appeared because the mass transfer rate was zero.

    “The air velocity was relatively large in the humid air flow region. Thus, the relation Y v Y vs B u a was satisfied and no frost appeared because the mass transfer rate was zero.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Numerical Simulation of Frosting on Fin-and-Tube Heat Exchanger Surfaces · p. 1

    Some frosting models have been coupled with multiphase flow models in CFD simulations [5,22,23].

    “Some frosting models have been coupled with multiphase flow models in CFD simulations [5,22,23].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [5] 2016, Phase Change Mass Transfer Model for Frost Growth and Densification, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer source
    • cites [22] 2011, A New Time- and Space-Dependent Model for Predicting Frost Formation, Appl. Therm. Eng. source
    • cites [23] 2015, Frosting Model for Predicting Macroscopic and Local Frost Behaviors on a Cold Plate, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 4 Results and Discussion · p. 5

    The frost density is generally higher with lower humid air temperature and higher water vapor concentration.

    “The frost density is generally higher with lower humid air temperature and higher water vapor concentration.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 4 Results and Discussion · p. 5

    Lower temperatures on the windward area near the tubes lead to larger phase change driving forces and water vapor quickly condenses to ice, resulting in faster frost growth and densification.

    “Thus, lower temperatures on the windward area near the tubes lead to larger phase change driving forces and the water vapor quickly condenses to ice resulting in faster frost growth and densification.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 4 Results and Discussion · p. 6

    The pressure drop increases because the frost layer occupies part of the flow passage, increasing velocities, and because ice crystals on the frost layer surface create a rougher surface.

    “The pressure drop increases not only because the frost layer occupies part of the flow passage which increases the velocities but also because the ice crystals on the frost layer surface create a rougher surface.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 4 Results and Discussion · p. 5

    The phase change driving force is very low on the downwind side and the water vapor mass transfer rate is too small to form much frost.

    “Thus, the phase change driving force is very low on the downwind side and the water vapor mass transfer rate is too small to form much frost.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
39 of 39
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Frost on heat exchanger surfaces increases thermal resistance and blocks air flow passages, reducing system energy efficiency and potentially causing system failure.

    “Frost on the heat exchanger surfaces increases the thermal resistance and blocks the air flow passages, which reduce the system energy efficiency and can even lead to system failure.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The outside tube surface temperature is constant due to the thin tube wall.

    “The outside tube surface temperature was assumed to be constant due to the thin tube wall.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The humid air is an incompressible Newtonian fluid due to the small velocities.

    “The humid air was assumed to be an incompressible Newtonian fluid due to the small velocities.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Thermal radiation is neglected due to the low temperatures.

    “Thermal radiation was neglected due to the low temperatures.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The ice in the porous frost layer is motionless, so convection heat transfer is neglected.

    “The ice in the porous frost layer was assumed to be motionless; thus, convection heat transfer was neglected.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Only mass transfer from water vapor to ice is considered; frost sublimation and melting are neglected.

    “Only the mass transfer from the water vapor to the ice was taken into consideration in the frosting process, i.e., the frost sublimation and melting processes were neglected.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The frost layer can be modeled as a porous media consisting of ice crystals and air gaps.

    “The frost layer is modeled as a porous media consisting of ice crystals and air gaps.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The conduction heat transfer in the z direction of the aluminum fin is ignored.

    “The conduction heat transfer with z direction of the aluminum fin was ignored.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The thermal conductivity of the primary phase is the value for dry air because water vapor concentration is very low.

    “Since the water vapor concentration was very low, the thermal conductivity of the primary phase was assumed to be the value for dry air.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The mass transfer diffusivity is constant at the low concentration limit.

    “The mass transfer diffusivity was assumed to be constant at the low concentration limit.”
10 of 10

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 25 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. 1984, Measurement of Frost Growth and Density in a Parallel Plate Geometry, ASHRAE Trans., 90, 278
  2. ASHRAE, 2001, 2001 ASHRAE Handbook-Fundamentals

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wu, X., Ma, Q., & Chu, F.
Affiliations
Tsinghua University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Wu, Xiaomin
  • Ma, Qiang
  • Chu, Fuqiang
Venue
Journal of Thermal Science and Engineering Applications
Published
2017-04-04
Volume
9
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 1948-5085 (ISSN-L)
  • 1948-5093
OpenAlex
W2586937942
Cited by
42
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4
FWCI
2.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Thermal Science and Engineering Applications (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Heat Transfer and Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Icing and De-icing Technologies
Keywords
frost formation, finned tube heat exchanger, frost growth, mass transfer modeling, air-to-air heat exchanger, thermal resistance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-21.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-21.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review