Characterization of Properties of Laser Powder Bed Fusion Three-Dimensional-Printed Inconel 718 for Centrifugal Turbomachinery Applications
Abstract
This paper presents the results of a comprehensive effort to characterize the properties of Inconel 718 produced by a form of laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) additive manufacturing (AM) or three-dimensional (3D)-printing, subsequently subjected to hot isostatic pressing (HIP) and heat treatment according to standards F3055-14a and AMS 5663, respectively. Material property data, while broadly available for traditional Inconel 718 presentations (e.g., forgings or castings) is currently lacking for the 3D-printed material. It is expected that while limited in size, the experimental data sets presented provide sufficient information to glean the capability of LPBF Inconel 718. These include: (1) chemical composition, electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD), and X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy (XEDS) characterization of 3D-printed material structure; (2) tensile properties—0.2% yield stress, ultimate stress, modulus of elasticity, and elongation to failure—based on 108 samples, as functions of temperature and sample print orientation; (3) creep rupture data including the Larson-Miller parameter, based on 21 samples; and (4) high cycle fatigue data based on 21 samples as a function of temperature. Results are compared to available standards and/or data for forged, cast, and other AM Inconel 718. A key observation of this study, based on the EBSD results, is that while the material appears to approach full recrystallization following heat treatment, there is a detectable fractio…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The mechanical properties of IN718 are slightly lower than those of forged parts but superior to those of cast components.
“While the mechanical properties of IN718 are slightly lower than those of forged parts, they are superior to those of cast components [70].”
From Towards Sustainability in Hydraulic Machinery Manufacturing by 3D Printing (2024) · cites this paper as [70]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Towards Sustainability in Hydraulic Machinery Manufacturing by 3D Printing
Remache, A., Pérez-Sánchez, M., Hidalgo, V. H., Ramos, H. M., & Sánchez-Romero, F.-J. (2024) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr12122664 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lea, H. G., Wooding, R. S., Kuhr, S., Rotella, J., & Córdova, J. L.
- Affiliations
- Mohawk Innovative Technology (United States) (US)
- United States Air Force Research Laboratory (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
- Publisher
- ASME International
- Published
- 2023-02-15
- Volume
- 145
- Issue
- 6
- ISSN
- 0742-4795 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-8919
- OpenAlex
- W4318318161
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 0.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Air Force Research Laboratory (FA8649-21-P-0932)
- U.S. Department of Energy (DE-SC0020793)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › High Temperature Alloys and Creep
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
- Keywords
- Inconel 718, laser powder bed fusion, additive manufacturing, hot isostatic pressing, heat treatment, tensile properties, creep rupture, high cycle fatigue, Larson-Miller parameter, recrystallization, printing orientation, temperature dependence, nickel-based superalloy, microstructure characterization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review