Cited by 7Turbomachinery Performance and OptimizationAdvanced Multi-Objective Optimization AlgorithmsTopology Optimization in Engineering

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Multi-Disciplinary Multi-Point Optimization of a Turbocharger Compressor Wheel

Abstract

The paper describes the application of an optimization method to the redesign of a turbocharger compressor wheel. The starting design presents quite high performance. Previous attempts to improve this design have shown it difficult to increase aerodynamic performance without compromising mechanical stress levels. The optimization methodology relies on the combination of a genetic algorithm, a neural network, a database, and user generated objective functions. The originality of the paper is that the optimization is not only coupled to a CFD solver, but also to a CSM solver, so that mechanical stresses can be included in the optimization objectives. A parametric model of the solid sector of the blade, back plate and bore zone is built and included in the optimization. The challenging turbocharger test case has allowed gaining experience with design objectives of different nature. The results show that the optimization has been able to improve the aero performance, while also decreasing the peak mechanical stress levels significantly.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1115/gt2015-43631

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Demeulenaere, A., Bonaccorsi, J.-C., Gutzwiller, D., Hu, L., & Sun, H.
Affiliations
  • Numerical Mechanics Applications International (Belgium) (BE)
  • Ford Motor Company (United States) (US)
Venue
Volume 2C: Turbomachinery
Published
2015-06-15
OpenAlex
W1850275657
Cited by
7
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3
FWCI
2.85
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Turbomachinery Performance and Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Topology Optimization in Engineering
Keywords
multi-point optimization, multidisciplinary design optimization, genetic algorithm, neural network surrogate model, aerodynamic performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review