Hydrodynamic and Heat Transfer Effects of Different Sparger Spacings Within a Column Photobioreactor Using Computational Fluid Dynamics
Abstract
An important factor in designing photobioreactors is appropriate selection of sparger geometry and placement. The sparger governs the bubble size distribution and gas hold-up. These factors in turn influence flow pattern, effective interfacial area, rates of mass transfer, heat transfer, and mixing. This project investigates the effects of sparger geometry and placement on bubble and fluid flow patterns and convective heat transfer within a column photobioreactor (PBR) using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD). Experimental and computational studies have been completed that focused on the hydrodynamics and heat transfer within a rectangular column photobioreactor (34.29 cm long × 15.25 cm wide × 34.29 cm tall) with a single sparger located at the center of its base (33.02 cm × 1.27 cm) running lengthwise. Similar studies have also been completed analyzing a full width sparger on the bottom of the PBR similar to a porous membrane sparger. This study extends previous work by investigating the flow patterns and heat transfer effects due to multiple rows of spargers at different spacings running perpendicular to the length of the PBR. Comparison of hydrodynamic and heat transfer parameters are made for the different types of spargers at different volumetric flow rates. The gas bubbles and the water-based media within the photobioreactor are modeled using the Lagrangian-Eulerian approach. A low Reynolds k-Epsilon turbulence model is used to predict near-wall flow patterns. The main interaction forces between the bubbles and the media, including drag forces, added mass forces, and lift forces, are considered. The overarching goal of this research is to improve PBR designs, thus enhancing microalgae production for biofuel and bioproducts production. It is hypothesized that changing the spacing of the PBR spargers will alter the bubble flow patterns. Despite its importance, optimizing the sparger geometry and placement in PBRs for microalgae production is still largely not understood. In this study, simulation results are presented for various sparger spacings, which can be helpful in designing sparger geometry and placement for maximized microalgae production.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Regarding the short mixing times in photobioreactors with small dimensions, one can even assume an almost homogeneous temperature distribution, which was also confirmed experimentally.
“Regarding the short mixing times in photobioreactors with small dimensions, one can even assume an almost homogeneous temperature distribution, which was also confirmed experimentally [119,120].”
From Modeling and Simulation of Photobioreactors with Computational Fluid Dynamics—A Comprehensive Review (2022) · cites this paper as [119]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 6
- Authors
- Bari, G. S., Gent, S. P., Suess, T. N., & Anderson, G. A.
- Affiliations
- South Dakota State University (US)
- Venue
- Volume 6: Energy, Parts A and B
- Published
- 2012-11-09
- Pages
- 43-52
- OpenAlex
- W2047400619
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 1.37
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition (IMECE) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques
- Keywords
- column photobioreactor, convective heat transfer, gas holdup, bubble size distribution, microalgae cultivation, microalgal biofuels
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review