Cited by 42Additive Manufacturing Materials and ProcessesAdditive Manufacturing and 3D Printing TechnologiesInnovations in Concrete and Construction Materials

Experimental investigation of selective laser melting of lunar regolith for in-situ applications

Fateri, Miranda, Gebhardt, Andreas, Khosravi, Maziar·2013·Volume 2A: Advanced Manufacturing

Abstract

Selective Laser Melting (SLM) is a powder based Additive manufacturing (AM) technology which builds an object layer wise using a laser beam to melt the powder on an elevated platform. Thus far numerous studies have investigated lunar manufacturing methods and construction but little is known about applicability of SLM of lunar regolith. As most lunar construction proposals require transportation of essential materials from Earth, using an in-situ manufacturing method with indigenous material would be considerably more economical. Fabrication of parts with SLM using various metals and ceramics has already been presented. As such, the feasibility of using lunar regolith mixture to create functional parts with SLM process is investigated. Variation of process parameters such as laser power, scan speed, and scan strategies is investigated and multiple 3D objects are successfully created and presented.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1115/imece2013-64334

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fateri et al. measured surface roughness averaged at Ra = 1.5 μm.

    “The measured surface roughness averaged at Ra = 1 . 5 μm .”
  • Fateri et al. found optimal process settings of 50 W laser power and 50 mm/s scan speed yielded acceptable microscopic results with uniform surface properties for JSC-1A regolith simulant.

    “Optimal process settings were determined to be 50 W for laser power and a scan speed of 50 mm/s, which yielded acceptable microscopic results with uniform surface properties.”
  • Fateri et al. measured surface hardness of 1245 HV.

    “which yielded a surface hardness of 1245 HV.”
  • Laser-based and electron beam sintering technologies use high-powered energy beams with precise energy delivery in controlled environments, ensuring consistent quality and enabling intricate details with fine resolutions.

    “In contrast, laser-based and electron beam sintering technologies use high-powered energy beams with precise energy delivery in controlled environments, ensuring consistent quality and enabling intricate details with fine resolutions [124-126].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fateri, M., Gebhardt, A., & Khosravi, M.
Affiliations
RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Venue
Volume 2A: Advanced Manufacturing
Published
2013-11-15
OpenAlex
W2004628660
Cited by
42
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2
FWCI
2.56
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Volume 2A: Advanced Manufacturing (publishedVersion)
  • OPUS (Aalen University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
Keywords
laser powder bed fusion, lunar regolith, in-situ resource utilization, lunar construction, additive manufacturing, process parameter optimization, laser power, scanning speed, scanning strategy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review