The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Material Property Testing of 3D-Printed Specimen in PLA on an Entry-Level 3D Printer
Abstract
An entry level consumer priced 3d-printer, the MakerBot Replicator 2x, was used to print specimen to conduct tensile, flexural and fatigue testing. Average priced, generic brand PLA material was used (similar to the filament a home user may purchase). Specimen were printed at raster orientation angles of 0°, 45° and 90° to test orientation effects on part strength. PLA filament was also tensile tested. Tensile testing of the 3d-printed specimens showed that the 45° raster orientation angle made the strongest specimen at an ultimate tensile strength of 64 MPa. The 0° and 90° raster orientation were not much less at 58 MPa and 54 MPa. A 3-point bending fixture was used to conduct flexural testing on printed specimen. For this type of testing, the 0° raster orientation produced the strongest parts with an ultimate bending stress of 102 MPa. Both the 45° and 90° raster orientations had similar results at 90 MPa and 86 MPa. For the fatigue testing, there was no clear best option, but there was a clearly worst option, the 90° raster orientation. This orientation clearly had lower fatigue lives than either of the other two raster orientations. The other two raster orientations, 0° and 45°, were very similar. PLA filament testing using bollard style grips, showed that the PLA filament exhibited mechanical properties similar to that of printed specimen — when tested at high enough strain rates that creep damage didn’t play a significant role. This may lead to implications for recycling failed 3d-print jobs and turning it back into reusable filament.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Measurements of the mechanical response of unidirectional 3D-printed PLA
Song, Y., Li, Y., Song, W., Yee, K., Lee, K.-Y., & Tagarielli, V. L. (2017) · Materials & Design · doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2017.03.051 · Cited by 624
Kafle, A., Luis, E., Silwal, R., Pan, H. M., Shrestha, P. L., & Bastola, A. K. (2021) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym13183101 · Cited by 587
Daminabo, S. C., Goel, S., Grammatikos, S. A., Nezhad, H. Y., & Thakur, V. K. (2020) · Materials Today Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.mtchem.2020.100248 · Cited by 567
Shanmugam, V., Das, O., Babu, K., Marimuthu, U., Veerasimman, A., Johnson, D. J., Neisiany, R. E., Hedenqvist, M. S., Ramakrishna, S., & Berto, F. (2021) · International Journal of Fatigue · doi:10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.106007 · Cited by 538
Process–Structure–Properties in Polymer Additive Manufacturing via Material Extrusion: A Review
Goh, G. D., Yap, Y. L., Tan, H. K. J., Sing, S. L., Goh, G. L., & Yeong, W. Y. (2020) · Critical Reviews in Solid State and Materials Sciences · doi:10.1080/10408436.2018.1549977 · Cited by 429
Metadata
- Authors
- Letcher, T., & Waytashek, M.
- Venue
- Volume 2A: Advanced Manufacturing
- Published
- 2014-11-14
- OpenAlex
- W2085911112
- Cited by
- 325
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.44
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Material Property Testing of 3D-Printed Specimen in PLA on an Entry-Level 3D Printer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1115/imece2014-39379
- The paper
- Letcher, T., & Waytashek, M. (2014). Material Property Testing of 3D-Printed Specimen in PLA on an Entry-Level 3D Printer. Volume 2A: Advanced Manufacturing. https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2014-39379
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.