Sensitivity variations in Bayard-Alpert gauges caused by Auger emission at the collector
Abstract
Positive ions strike the collector of a BAG at energies of the order of 100 eV where almost all secondary electrons result from Auger electron emission, thus a change in Auger yield causes a change in the apparent gauge sensitivity. The Auger yield is strongly affected by the presence of chemisorbed gas layers on the surface. Experiments are reported that show the change in gauge sensitivity for rare gases caused by the adsorption of CO, O2, N2, or H2 on the collector. At the high pressure used for most absolute gauge calibration the collector may be rapidly cleaned by sputtering, resulting in a different sensitivity than in normal gauge use. Experiments confirm that errors in absolute sensitivity measurements of several percent can result unless care is taken to minimize sputtering of the collector. Investigations of various collector materials to reduce this effect are reported.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Pt-clad Mo is the best option for the collector.
“Since the latter is fragile and harder to handle, it was concluded that Pt-clad Mo is the best option for the collector.”
From A review on hot cathode ionisation gauges with focus on a suitable design for measurement accuracy and stability (2020) · cites this paper as [111]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Jousten, K., Boineau, F., Bundaleski, N., Illgen, C., Setina, J., Teodoro, O. M. N. D., Vicar, M., & Wüest, M. (2020) · Vacuum · doi:10.1016/j.vacuum.2020.109545 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gopalaraman, C. P., Armstrong, R. A., & Redhead, P. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology
- Publisher
- American Vacuum Society
- Published
- 1970-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 195-198
- ISSN
- 0022-5355
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review