Cited by 12

Sensitivity variation of Bayard–Alpert gauges with and without closed grids from 10−4 to 1 Pa

Peacock, R. N., Peacock, N. T.·1990·Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A: Vacuum, Surfaces, and Films

Abstract

Since the accurate range of the spinning rotor gauge (SRG) does not extend below 10−4 Pa, constant sensitivity of high vacuum gauges for at least one decade above this value is important for their calibration when using an SRG. Two pairs of nude Bayard–Alpert (BA) gauges were compared with an SRG over the range 10−4–1 Pa. One pair was made from two identical, commercial, nude ultrahigh vacuum (UHV) BA gauges by removing the grid caps from one gauge. At 1.0 mA emission, the sensitivity of the gauge with closed grid started to decrease at 10−3 Pa, falling from 0.18/Pa to 0.047/Pa at 1.6 Pa. With open grid, the sensitivity was constant at 0.096/Pa to 10−3 Pa, increased slightly, and then fell to 0.047/Pa at 1.6 Pa. A pair of nude gauges was built with grids 16 mm in diameter by 26 mm long, identical except that one had a closed grid and the other did not. The sensitivity of the gauge with closed grid was nearly constant at 0.069/Pa to 1.3×10−2 Pa, decreasing to 0.033/Pa at 1.6 Pa, and with open grid was constant at 0.049/Pa to 4×10−1 Pa, falling to 0.033/Pa at 1.6 Pa. At an emission current of 0.10 mA, constant sensitivity extended to higher pressures for all gauges.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1116/1.576547

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Peacock, R. N., & Peacock, N. T.
Venue
Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A: Vacuum, Surfaces, and Films
Published
1990-07-01
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
3341-3344
ISSN
  • 0734-2101
  • 1520-8559
Cited by
12
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review