Long-term stability of Bayard–Alpert gauge performance: Results obtained from repeated calibrations against the National Institute of Standards and Technology primary vacuum standard
Abstract
This article presents and briefly discusses information on the long-term stability of the sensitivity of Bayard–Alpert ionization gauges with time and use, derived from an analysis of data for Bayard–Alpert gauge calibrations performed at the National Institute of Standards and Technology over a ten year period.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Gauges with tungsten filaments showed higher stability than those with ThO2-Ir filaments.
“Gauges with tungsten filaments showed a higher stability than those with ThO 2 -Ir filaments.”
From A review on hot cathode ionisation gauges with focus on a suitable design for measurement accuracy and stability (2020) · cites this paper as [152]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Jousten, K., Boineau, F., Bundaleski, N., Illgen, C., Setina, J., Teodoro, O. M. N. D., Vicar, M., & Wüest, M. (2020) · Vacuum · doi:10.1016/j.vacuum.2020.109545 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Review Article: Recommended practice for calibrating vacuum gauges of the ionization type
Fedchak, J. A., Abbott, P. J., Hendricks, J. H., Arnold, P. C., & Peacock, N. T. (2018) · Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A: Vacuum, Surfaces, and Films · doi:10.1116/1.5025060 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Filippelli, A. R., & Abbott, P. J.
- Affiliations
- Chemical Science and Technology Laboratory, Thermophysics Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899
- Venue
- Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A: Vacuum, Surfaces, and Films
- Publisher
- American Vacuum Society
- Published
- 1995-09-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2582-2586
- ISSN
- 0734-2101
- 1520-8559
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
