The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Digital Watermarking
Abstract
Digital watermarking technology has loudly proclaimed its arrival over the past several years. It is difficult to find any journal associated with signals, imaging, sound, or video that doesn’t have a handful of digital watermarking related articles. Having worked in this field for several years now, I know that there is still quite a bit of confusion among users and policy makers about what this technology can and can’t do. Because the field is rather new, confusion is present even among the researchers. Signs of this confusion are multiple meanings for technical terms and rampant re-invention of basic algorithms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Digital Camera Identification From Sensor Pattern Noise
Luka, J., Fridrich, J., & Goljan, M. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2006.873602 · Cited by 1,328
Robust and secure image hashing
Swaminathan, A., Mao, Y., & Wu, M. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2006.873601 · Cited by 552
Data hiding in binary image for authentication and annotation
Wu, M., & Liu, B. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Multimedia · doi:10.1109/tmm.2004.830814 · Cited by 375
(2010) · Cited by 230
Artificial Fingerprinting for Generative Models: Rooting Deepfake Attribution in Training Data
Yu, N., Skripniuk, V., Abdelnabi, S., & Fritz, M. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.01418 · Cited by 195
Metadata
- Authors
- Cox, I.
- Venue
- Journal of Electronic Imaging
- Publisher
- SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng
- Published
- 2002-07-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 414
- ISSN
- 1017-9909 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2611745365
- Cited by
- 2,289
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Digital Watermarking. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1117/1.1494075
- The paper
- Cox, I. (2002). Digital Watermarking. Journal of Electronic Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.1494075
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
