The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fog attenuation prediction for optical and infrared waves
Abstract
The principal disadvantage of using free space optics (FSO) telecommunication systems is the disturbing role played by the atmosphere on light propagation and thus on the channel capacity, availability, and link reliability. The wavelength choice is currently a subject of disagreement among designers and users of FSO equipments. Generally this equipment operates in the visible and the near IR at 690, 780, 850, and 1550 nm. Several authors affirm that equipment working at 1550 nm presents less atmospheric attenuation in the presence of fog and thus better link availability. Others consider that for dense fogs (visibility<500 m), all wavelengths are attenuated in the same way (wavelength independence). Fog attenuation in the visible and IR regions is reviewed from an empirical and theoretical point of view. Laser system performance in the presence of fog (advection and convection) in the 0.4- to 15-µm spectral zone is investigated using FASCOD computation. A transmission gain of 42% for a lasercom system working at 780 nm is observed compared to the same system working at 1550 nm. This gain reaches 48% if the same system works at 690 nm. Finally, we propose a fast transmission relationship based on an exact Mie theory calculation valid in the 0.69- to 1.55-µm spectral bands. It enables us to predict fog attenuation according to visibility without using heavy computer codes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles
Bohren, C. F., & Huffman, D. R. (1998) · doi:10.1002/9783527618156 · Cited by 18,474
Beiträge zur Optik trüber Medien, speziell kolloidaler Metallösungen
Mie, G. (1908) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.19083300302 · Cited by 11,537
Light Scattering by Small Particles
Van de Hulst, H. C., & Twersky, V. (1957) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.3060205 · Cited by 5,619
Shettle, E. P., & Fenn, R. W. (1979) · University of Michigan Library Repository · Cited by 1,000
Kim, I. I., McArthur, B., & Korevaar, E. J. (2001) · SPIE Proceedings · doi:10.1117/12.417512 · Cited by 910
Willebrand, H. A., & Ghuman, B. S. (2001) · IEEE Spectrum · doi:10.1109/6.938713 · Cited by 249
Transmission by Haze and Fog in the Spectral Region 035 to 10 Microns*
Arnulf, A., Bricard, J., Curé, E., & Veret, C. M. (1957) · Journal of the Optical Society of America · doi:10.1364/josa.47.000491 · Cited by 111
Effects of Precipitation on Propagation at 0.63, 3.5, and 10.6 Microns
Chu, T. S., & Hogg, D. (1968) · Bell System Technical Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1968.tb00058.x · Cited by 104
Cited by
Optical Communication in Space: Challenges and Mitigation Techniques
Kaushal, H., & Kaddoum, G. (2017) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2016.2603518 · Cited by 1,927
Outage Capacity Optimization for Free-Space Optical Links With Pointing Errors
Farid, A. A., & Hranilovic, S. (2007) · Journal of Lightwave Technology · doi:10.1109/jlt.2007.899174 · Cited by 1,590
Vehicular Visible Light Communications: A Survey
Memedi, A., & Dressler, F. (2021) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2020.3034224 · Cited by 299
Metadata
- Authors
- Al Naboulsi, M.
- Venue
- Optical Engineering
- Publisher
- SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng
- Published
- 2004-02-01
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 319
- ISSN
- 0091-3286 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1825980438
- Cited by
- 405
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 5.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fog attenuation prediction for optical and infrared waves. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1117/1.1637611
- The paper
- Al Naboulsi, M. (2004). Fog attenuation prediction for optical and infrared waves. Optical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.1637611
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.