The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparison of laser beam propagation at 785 nm and 1550 nm in fog and haze for optical wireless communications:
Abstract
12 There is currently a misconception among designers and users of free space laser communication (lasercom) equipment that 1550 nm light suffers from less atmospheric attenuation than 785 or 850 nm light in all weather conditions. This misconception is based upon a published equation for atmospheric attenuation as a function of wavelength, which is used frequently in the free-space lasercom literature. In hazy weather (visibility > 2 km), the prediction of less atmospheric attenuation at 1550 nm is most likely true. However, in foggy weather (visibility < 500 m), it appears that the attenuation of laser light is independent of wavelength, ie. 785 nm, 850 nm, and 1550 nm are all attenuated equally by fog. This same wavelength independence is also observed in snow and rain. This observation is based on an extensive literature search, and from full Mie scattering calculations. A modification to the published equation describing the atmospheric attenuation of laser power, which more accurately describes the effects of fog, is offered. This observation of wavelength-independent attenuation in fog is important, because fog, heavy snow, and extreme rain are the only types of weather that are likely to disrupt short (< 500 m) lasercom links. Short lasercom links will be necessary to meet the high availability requirements of the telecommunications industry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles
Bohren, C. F., & Huffman, D. R. (1998) · doi:10.1002/9783527618156 · Cited by 18,474
Atmospheric science: an introductory survey
(2007) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-3925 · Cited by 1,859
Electromagnetic Scattering on Spherical Polydispersions
Deirmendjian, D. (1971) · Zeitschrift für Meteorologie Band 22, Heft 1-5 · doi:10.1515/9783112557563-049 · Cited by 1,179
Laser Beam Propagation in the Atmosphere
Weichel, H. (1990) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 194
Transmission by Haze and Fog in the Spectral Region 035 to 10 Microns*
Arnulf, A., Bricard, J., Curé, E., & Veret, C. M. (1957) · Journal of the Optical Society of America · doi:10.1364/josa.47.000491 · Cited by 111
Effects of Precipitation on Propagation at 0.63, 3.5, and 10.6 Microns
Chu, T. S., & Hogg, D. (1968) · Bell System Technical Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1968.tb00058.x · Cited by 104
The International Station Meteorological Climate Summary CD-ROM
Jarrett, T. (1992) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/1520-0477(1992)073<1578:tismcs>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 22
Cited by
Optical Communication in Space: Challenges and Mitigation Techniques
Kaushal, H., & Kaddoum, G. (2017) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2016.2603518 · Cited by 1,927
Outage Capacity Optimization for Free-Space Optical Links With Pointing Errors
Farid, A. A., & Hranilovic, S. (2007) · Journal of Lightwave Technology · doi:10.1109/jlt.2007.899174 · Cited by 1,590
Correction of laser scanning intensity data: Data and model-driven approaches
Höfle, B., & Pfeifer, N. (2007) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2007.05.008 · Cited by 558
Sandalidis, H. G., Tsiftsis, T. A., & Karagiannidis, G. K. (2009) · Journal of Lightwave Technology · doi:10.1109/jlt.2009.2024169 · Cited by 419
Fog attenuation prediction for optical and infrared waves
Al Naboulsi, M. (2004) · Optical Engineering · doi:10.1117/1.1637611 · Cited by 405
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, I. I., McArthur, B., & Korevaar, E. J.
- Venue
- SPIE Proceedings
- Publisher
- SPIE
- Published
- 2001-02-06
- Volume
- 4214
- Pages
- 26-37
- ISSN
- 0277-786X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1983330672
- Cited by
- 910
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 7.48
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of laser beam propagation at 785 nm and 1550 nm in fog and haze for optical wireless communications:. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1117/12.417512
- The paper
- Kim, I. I., McArthur, B., & Korevaar, E. J. (2001). Comparison of laser beam propagation at 785 nm and 1550 nm in fog and haze for optical wireless communications:. SPIE Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.417512
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.