Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 910

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparison of laser beam propagation at 785 nm and 1550 nm in fog and haze for optical wireless communications:

Kim, Isaac I., McArthur, Bruce, Korevaar, Eric J.·2001·SPIE Proceedings

Abstract

12 There is currently a misconception among designers and users of free space laser communication (lasercom) equipment that 1550 nm light suffers from less atmospheric attenuation than 785 or 850 nm light in all weather conditions. This misconception is based upon a published equation for atmospheric attenuation as a function of wavelength, which is used frequently in the free-space lasercom literature. In hazy weather (visibility > 2 km), the prediction of less atmospheric attenuation at 1550 nm is most likely true. However, in foggy weather (visibility < 500 m), it appears that the attenuation of laser light is independent of wavelength, ie. 785 nm, 850 nm, and 1550 nm are all attenuated equally by fog. This same wavelength independence is also observed in snow and rain. This observation is based on an extensive literature search, and from full Mie scattering calculations. A modification to the published equation describing the atmospheric attenuation of laser power, which more accurately describes the effects of fog, is offered. This observation of wavelength-independent attenuation in fog is important, because fog, heavy snow, and extreme rain are the only types of weather that are likely to disrupt short (< 500 m) lasercom links. Short lasercom links will be necessary to meet the high availability requirements of the telecommunications industry.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1117/12.417512

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 910

Metadata

Authors
Kim, I. I., McArthur, B., & Korevaar, E. J.
Venue
SPIE Proceedings
Publisher
SPIE
Published
2001-02-06
Volume
4214
Pages
26-37
ISSN
0277-786X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1983330672
Cited by
910
References
7
FWCI
7.48
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of laser beam propagation at 785 nm and 1550 nm in fog and haze for optical wireless communications:. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1117/12.417512
The paper
Kim, I. I., McArthur, B., & Korevaar, E. J. (2001). Comparison of laser beam propagation at 785 nm and 1550 nm in fog and haze for optical wireless communications:. SPIE Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.417512

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.