Constrained optimization of Drude's equations eliminates effects of confounding molecules for the polarimetric measurement of glucose
Open accessAbstract
Common confounding factors for polarimetric concentration measurements include additional optical rotations from unknown optically active molecules, linear birefringence of the medium, and path length variability. We show that by approximating Drude's equation and taking several measurements from the same sample at different wavelengths, the error due to confounding rotations in the measurements can theoretically be canceled. The analysis is developed with regard to glucose sensing in aqueous humor. First, we show that the optical rotatory dispersions of the known molecules in bovine aqueous humor could be represented by Drude's equations. Then, the total optical rotation is approximated by a function combining Drude's equations for the major contributors in the sample, i.e., glucose, glutamine, fructose, and phenylalanine. The concentration-related unknown coefficients in the approximating function are found by constrained nonlinear optimization of the function at different wavelengths. This technique is tested on a published data set and four alterations of those data: (1) concentrations randomly varied within narrow limits, (2) similar to alteration 1 but with significantly elevated glucose concentration, (3) similar to alteration 1 but with significantly decreased glucose concentration, and (4) concentrations randomly varied within wider limits than alteration 1. The method produces very accurate glucose-concentration estimates in all of these data sets. The relative error was smaller than 1% in all except the low-glucose sample (1.4%). This method may prove useful in noninvasive glucose measurement in humans.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The specific rotation values obtained for grocery store sugar and fructose were lower than those predicted by the Drude equation.
“The values obtained were lower than those predicted by the Drude equation [7, 20, 21] shown in Fig. 13.”
From Building an analogue simulator of a photonic quantum computer with transparent tape, maple syrup, and cat lasers, and implementing first quantum algorithms in the classroom (2026) · cites this paper as [21]
Section 3.1 tests how well Drude’s equation fits molecular optical-rotation data, and Section 4 describes a theoretical analysis based on bovine aqueous humor. Neither reports measured specific rotations for grocery-store sugar and fructose or compares those measurements with Drude predictions (searched for grocery-store sugar, fructose, and lower measured rotation). (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- E. Charney, The Molecular Basis of Optical Activity: Optical Rota- tory Dispersion and Circular Dichroism, Wiley, New York ͑1979͒.
- G. L. Cote ´, M. D. Fox, and R. B. Northrop, ''Noninvasive optical polarimetric glucose sensing using a true phase measurement tech- nique,'' IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 39, 752-756 ͑1992͒.
- B. D. Cameron and G. L. Cote ´, ''Noninvasive glucose sensing utiliz- ing a digital closed-loop polarimetric approach,'' IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 44, 1221-1227 ͑1997͒.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
- Authors
- Güçlü, B., Engbretson, G. A., & Bolanowski, S. J.
- Affiliations
- Syracuse University (US)
- ORCID
- Güçlü, Burak
- Venue
- Journal of Biomedical Optics
- Publisher
- SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng
- Published
- 2004-09-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 05
- Pages
- 967-977
- ISSN
- 1083-3668 (ISSN-L)
- 1560-2281
- OpenAlex
- W2169628238
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Biomedical Optics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Research to Prevent Blindness
- State University of New York
- National Institutes of Health
- National Eye Institute (EY-13772, R03EY013772)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Optical Polarization and Ellipsometry
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Molecular spectroscopy and chirality
- Keywords
- optical rotatory dispersion, aqueous humor, nonlinear programming, non-invasive glucose monitoring, linear birefringence, glutamine, fructose, phenylalanine
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Animals, Aqueous Humor, Cattle, Glucose, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Microscopy, Polarization, Numerical Analysis, Computer-Assisted, Refractometry, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Complex Mixtures
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review