Cited by 0Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum Information and CryptographyQuantum Mechanics and Applications

Building an analogue simulator of a photonic quantum computer with transparent tape, maple syrup, and cat lasers, and implementing first quantum algorithms in the classroom

Open access
Lefebvre, Ghislain·2026·Physics Education

Abstract

This work presents the implementation of single-qubit gates, including R x and R z gates realized using transparent adhesive tape, and R y gates obtained with optically active maple and agave solutions. These gates form the native gate set of a simple photonic system and are subsequently used to construct a Hadamard gate. Two forms of two-qubit gates are introduced using a combination of a calcite crystal and transparent tape. The setups employ both the polarization and the path degree of freedom of a photon as qubits, illustrating how readily accessible materials can be used to manipulate and transform the quantum information they convey. Calculations are performed to determine the birefringence of two different types of tape and to quantify the specific rotations introduced by multiple layers of transparent tape. Finally, simple algorithms and exercises are proposed for students. These experimental setups are designed to facilitate hands-on manipulation of quantum effects while lowering the barrier to accessing quantum systems, with total costs kept below $50 CAD for the single-qubit gates and below $100 CAD for all experiments combined. The configurations presented serve as an analogue simulator of a photonic quantum computer: although the laser beams used can be described classically, all theoretical considerations and experimental procedures remain valid for quantized systems employing single-photon emitters and single-photon detectors.

Verified 2026-10-23 · 2 references not checked yet

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

The paper presents a low-cost analog simulator of a photonic quantum computer built from transparent tape, maple/agave syrup, calcite, polarizers, and a cat laser pointer, implementing single-qubit rotations, a Hadamard gate, CNOT/controlled gates, and a one-qubit Deutsch algorithm. It reports birefringence and rotation-angle calibrations for two tape brands at 405, 532, and 650 nm, with total costs below $50 CAD for single-qubit gates and below $100 CAD for all experiments.

Key findings

  • Native gates are implemented as R_x and R_z gates using transparent adhesive tape, and R_y gates using optically active maple and agave solutions; a Hadamard gate is decomposed into R_y(-π/4), Z, and R_y(π/4). Calcite acts as a CNOT gate, entangling polarization and path qubits.
  • Michel-Lévy chart estimates give birefringence Δn ≈ 0.0148 for Office Works tape (25 µm thick) and ≈ 0.0140 for Canada Post tape (30 µm thick); direct measurements across 405, 532, and 650 nm show nearly constant birefringence for blue and green, with a drop for red. Six linear fits of rotation angle versus tape layers have R² values of 0.9973 or greater.
  • Table 1 reports rotation angles per layer; for example, one layer of Office Works tape gives 332° (blue), 248° (green), and 160° (red), while one layer of Canada Post tape gives 25° (blue), 287° (green), and 127° (red). Best R_z(-π/2) gates are 3 layers Office Works for blue (275°), 4 layers Office Works for green (272°), and 5 layers Canada Post for red (277°).
  • A modified one-qubit Deutsch algorithm is implemented with an unknown 180° gate; a single measurement distinguishes whether the underlying rotation is about the x-axis or z-axis, though it does not identify which of the four specific gates was used.

Methods

  • Design: an analog photonic quantum computer simulator using polarization and path degrees of freedom, assembled from a laser pointer, polarizing filters, transparent adhesive tape, sucrose/fructose/maple/agave solutions, a calcite crystal, a rotating polarizer, and a screen.
  • Data/sample: two transparent tape brands (Office Works and Canada Post), up to six layers per gate, tested with 405 nm blue, 532 nm green, and 650 nm red lasers; rotation angles and birefringence were measured.
  • Analysis: approximate birefringence from a Michel-Lévy chart; precise rotation angles from extinction-angle measurements with a rotating polarizer and an R_z(-π/2) gate; linear regression of rotation angle versus number of tape layers; quantum circuits for gates and algorithms.

Limitations

  • The paper states that using continuous laser light places the system in the classical regime; true quantum operation would require a single-photon emitter and single-photon detector.
  • Alignment is delicate, and the tape’s optical axis is not necessarily parallel to its edge; in this setup it was observed to lie approximately 12° from the edge. The Michel-Lévy chart gives only a single approximate birefringence value, commercial sugars are not laboratory-grade and impurities reduce rotation, calcite introduces an unknown phase, and the modified Deutsch algorithm only distinguishes x-axis from z-axis rotations, not which of the four gates was used.
  • The provided text is a preprint and includes a notice that results should not be considered conclusive or validated information.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1361-6552/ae7b9f

Cites

17 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

3 of 43 cited sources checked · 1 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation
    § 1 Introduction · p. 3

    For the experiment to operate in the quantum regime, one would need a single-photon emitter and a single-photon detector.

    “For the experiment to operate in the quantum regime, or, in other words, to be truly quantized , one would need a single-photon emitter and a single-photon detector [3].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [3] Couteau, 2023, Applications of single photons to quantum communication and computing, Nat. Rev. Phys. source

      Section 1.1.1.1 (page unavailable) describes an experiment that uses a single-photon source and single-photon detectors to demonstrate photon antibunching. It does not say that every experiment needs those components to operate in the quantum regime, so the citing sentence overstates the source. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingcitation
    § 4.1 Ry gates: maple syrup and agave syrup · p. 12

    An alternative method is to begin with agave syrup or maple syrup and dilute each of them to achieve the desired rotation.

    “An alternative method is to begin with agave syrup (a fructose-rich solution) [22] or maple syrup (a sucrose-rich solution) [23] and dilute each of them to achieve the desired rotation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [22] Mahurin, 1999, Demonstration of optical rotatory dispersion of sucrose, J. Chem. Educ. source
    • cites [23] Saraiva, 2022, Agave syrup: chemical analysis and nutritional profile, applications in the food industry and health impacts, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health source
  • Findingown data
    § 4.1 Ry gates: maple syrup and agave syrup · p. 11

    The specific rotation values obtained for grocery store sugar and fructose were lower than those predicted by the Drude equation.

    “The values obtained were lower than those predicted by the Drude equation [7, 20, 21] shown in Fig. 13.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [7] Parra Cordova, 2025, A Lab Tool for Sugar: The Optical Rotatory Dispersion of d -Glucose from Its Mutarotation Kinetics with a Home-Made Polarimeter, J. Chem. Educ. source
    • cites [20] Soetedjo, 2014, Use of a modified Drude’s equation to investigate the optical rotation property of sugars, Optik source
    • cites [21] Güçlü, 2004, Constrained optimization of Drude’s equations eliminates effects of confounding molecules for the polarimetric measurement of glucose, J. Biomed. Opt. source

      Section 3.1 tests how well Drude’s equation fits molecular optical-rotation data, and Section 4 describes a theoretical analysis based on bovine aqueous humor. Neither reports measured specific rotations for grocery-store sugar and fructose or compares those measurements with Drude predictions (searched for grocery-store sugar, fructose, and lower measured rotation). (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingnone given
    § Abstract · p. 2

    The setups employ both the polarization and the path degree of freedom of a photon as qubits.

    “The setups employ both the polarization and the path degree of freedom of a photon as qubits”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingnone given
    § Abstract · p. 2

    Two forms of two-qubit gates are introduced using a combination of a calcite crystal and transparent tape.

    “Two forms of two-qubit gates are introduced using a combination of a calcite crystal and transparent tape.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 43
  • May combine two claims. 26
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingnone given
    § Abstract · p. 2

    Total costs are kept below $50 CAD for the single-qubit gates.

    “with total costs kept below $ 50 CAD for the single-qubit gates”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingnone given
    § Abstract · p. 2

    Calculations are performed to determine the birefringence of two different types of tape.

    “Calculations are performed to determine the birefringence of two different types of tape”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § 4.3 Rx and Rz implementation · p. 15

    The Rx† and Rz† gates are obtained, respectively, by rotating the Rx gate by 180° around the vertical axis or by orienting the optical axis of the tape vertically.

    “The R † x and R † z gates are obtained, respectively, by rotating the R x gate by 180 ◦ around the vertical axis or by orienting the optical axis of the tape vertically.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § 4.1 Ry gates: maple syrup and agave syrup · p. 11

    For our apparatus, we used common grocery store granulated sugar and fructose and determined their specific rotation values for lasers at 405 nm, 532 nm, and 650 nm.

    “For our apparatus, we used common grocery store granulated sugar (a sucrose-rich substance) [19] and fructose and determined their specific rotation values for lasers at 405 nm (blue), 532 nm (green), and 650 nm (red).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [19] National Center for Biotechnology Information, 2026, Pubchem compound summary for cid 5988

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 4.5 Birefringence of transparent tape · p. 17

    The same situation with the second polarizer vertically polarized shows a vibrant array of colours, different from the first set.

    “Fig. 24 presents the same situation with the second polarizer vertically polarized. We again see a vibrant array of colours, though different from the first set”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data
    § 4.4 Calibration · p. 15

    In our setup, the optical axis of the tape was observed to lie approximately 12° from the edge of the tape.

    “In our setup, the optical axis of the tape was observed to lie approximately 12 ◦ from the edge of the tape.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § 3.3 The case of calcite · p. 10

    Birefringence manifests differently in transparent tape compared to calcite; the tape does not produce a double image.

    “Notice that birefringence manifests differently in transparent tape compared to calcite; i.e., the tape does not produce a double image.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given
    § 4.5 Birefringence of transparent tape · p. 16

    When a single layer of Office Works tape is placed at a 45° angle between two horizontal polarizers and illuminated with white light, the perceived colour is blue.

    “when a single layer of Office Works tape is placed at a 45 ◦ angle between two horizontal polarizers and illuminated with white light, the perceived colour is blue”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § 4.4 Calibration · p. 15

    Although manufacturing techniques for transparent tape are very stable and yield highly consistent products, the optical axis is not necessarily perfectly parallel to the edge of the tape.

    “although the manufacturing techniques for transparent tape are very stable and yield highly consistent products, the optical axis is not necessarily perfectly parallel to the edge of the tape.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Manufacturing techniques for transparent tape are very stable and yield highly consistent products.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given
    § 4.3 Rx and Rz implementation · p. 13

    For each brand of tape, we fabricated six distinct rotation angles using up to six layers of tape.

    “For each brand of tape, we fabricated six distinct rotation angles using up to six layers of tape.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given
    § 4.3 Rx and Rz implementation · p. 13

    In our setup, we employed two brands of transparent tape: Office Works tape and Canada Post tape.

    “In our setup, we employed two brands of transparent tape: Office Works tape and Canada Post tape.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given
    § 5.2 Deutsch algorithm implementation · p. 29

    In the red-laser implementation of the Deutsch algorithm, the unknown gate consists of one layer of Office Works tape and three layers of Canada Post tape (182°), oriented in one of four possible directions.

    “In practice, for red-laser implementation, the unknown gate consists of one layer of Office Works tape and three layers of Canada Post tape (182 ◦ ), oriented in one of four possible directions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given
    § 4.10 CRx and CRy and CRz gates · p. 27

    In the Fig. 36 CNOT implementation, the CNOT is implemented using one layer of Office Works tape and three layers of Canada Post tape with a red laser.

    “In this example, the CNOT is implemented using one layer of Office Works tape and three layers of Canada Post tape with a red laser.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given
    § 5.1 Inverse gates · p. 28

    The Ry and R†y gates encountered with fructose and sucrose solutions were adjusted to produce the same rotation but in opposite directions.

    “The usage of R y and R † y gates have already been encountered in the context of fructose and sucrose solutions, which were adjusted to produce the same rotation but in opposite directions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § 6 Conclusions · p. 31

    The setup costs less than $50 CAD for the single qubit experiments and less than $100 CAD for all of the experiments.

    “Our setup costs less than $50 CAD for the single qubit experiments and less than $100 CAD for all of the experiments.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingreasoning
    § 5.1 Inverse gates · p. 28

    In Fig. 37, the light that passes through a single layer of tape in each of the four arms appears blue.

    “The light that passes through a single layer of tape in each of the four arms appears blue, in accordance with what we discussed in Sections 4.5 and 4.6.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data
    § 4.10 CRx and CRy and CRz gates · p. 27

    An unknown phase φ is present in the Fig. 36 CNOT circuit, as indicated by the term e^{iφ}.

    “Additionally, an unknown phase ϕ is present, as indicated by the term e iϕ .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The calcite crystal introduces an unknown phase φ between the |00> and |11> states.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Findingnone given
    § 4.8 Hadamard gate: maple syrup, agave syrup, and transparent tape · p. 24

    A maple syrup solution physically rotates the polarization of light by -22.5° (-45° on the Bloch sphere).

    “the tools developed in the previous sections can be arranged to implement the Hadamard gate by first placing a maple syrup solution that physically rotates the polarization of light by -22.5 ° (-45 ° on the Bloch sphere)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data
    § 4.7 More precise birefringence determination · p. 22

    The birefringence values measured in this experiment remain lower than those reported by Slepkov [12].

    “although the values measured in our experiment remain lower than those reported in that study.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [12] Slepkov, 2022, Quantitative measurement of birefringence in transparent films across the visible spectrum, Am. J. Phys. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 5.1 Inverse gates · p. 28

    In Fig. 37, the central square appears white, matching the incoming light, due to the annihilating effect of the second gate.

    “We see that the central square appears white, matching the incoming light. This is due to the annihilating effect of the second gate.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § 4.10 CRx and CRy and CRz gates · p. 27

    In the Fig. 36 CNOT circuit, q0 is always in state |0>, so the two qubits are no longer entangled.

    “This shows that q 0 (noted on the right of | 00 ⟩ or | 10 ⟩ ) is always in state | 0 ⟩ , and therefore the two qubits are no longer entangled.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given
    § A.8 Polarizer as a measurement device · p. 36

    The laser emits about 10^15 photons per second.

    “In our apparatus, the laser is emitting about 10 15 photons per second.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 3.2 Birefringence · p. 9

    If the phase shift deviates from exactly λ/4, the output polarization becomes elliptical instead.

    “If the phase shift deviates from exactly λ 4 , the output polarization becomes elliptical instead [14].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [14] Edwards, 1981, On Producing Colours Using Birefringence Property of Transparent, Colourless Stretched Cellophane, Leonardo source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § 3.2 Birefringence · p. 8

    Birefringence is the property of certain materials to exhibit two or more distinct refractive indices when photons propagate along different axes.

    “Birefringence is the property of certain materials to exhibit two (or more) distinct refractive indices n when photons propagate along different axes [11, 12].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [11] Raymer, 2017 source
    • cites [12] Slepkov, 2022, Quantitative measurement of birefringence in transparent films across the visible spectrum, Am. J. Phys. source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 1 Introduction · p. 3

    The theory presented describes experiments from the quantum perspective of single photons.

    “this is why the theory presented below describes experiments from the quantum perspective of single photons.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 3.3 The case of calcite · p. 10

    Calcite crystals are well known for producing double images when placed over simple drawings or printed text.

    “These crystals are well known for producing double images when placed over simple drawings or printed text (Fig. 9) [13, 16, 17].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [13] Klein, 1993

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [16] Duda, 1991

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [17] Nikon MicroscopyU Birefringence in Calcite Crystals

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Premisecitation
    § 1 Introduction · p. 3

    Quantum computing is often perceived as a highly sophisticated field requiring expensive equipment.

    “Quantum computing is often perceived as a highly sophisticated field requiring expensive equipment [1].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [1] Dargan, 2023, The price of a quantum computer

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 1 Introduction · p. 3

    Aside from the limitation of needing a single-photon emitter and detector, the remainder of the explanation applies perfectly to the quantum realm.

    “Aside from this limitation, the remainder of the explanation applies perfectly to the quantum realm”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Abstract · p. 2

    Although the laser beams used can be described classically, all theoretical considerations and experimental procedures remain valid for quantized systems employing single-photon emitters and single-photon detectors.

    “although the laser beams used can be described classically, all theoretical considerations and experimental procedures remain valid for quantized systems employing single-photon emitters and singlephoton detectors.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given
    § 4.7 More precise birefringence determination · p. 19

    A polarizing filter mounted on a graduated wheel enables precise measurement of the polarization angle.

    “One essential tool for experimentally determining the angle of linear polarization is a polarizing filter mounted on a graduated wheel (Fig. 26). This device enables precise measurement of the polarization angle.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given
    § 4.7 More precise birefringence determination · p. 19

    In practice, it is easier to identify the extinction angle than to determine the angle corresponding to maximum transmitted intensity.

    “In practice, it is easier to identify the angle at which no light passes through the filter, the extinction angle , than to determine the angle corresponding to maximum transmitted intensity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning
    § 4.4 Calibration · p. 15

    Precise alignment of the transparent tape is one of the most delicate aspects of assembling this experiment; any tilt in an Rx or Rz gate will reduce the accuracy of the results.

    “One of the most delicate aspects of assembling this experiment is the precise alignment of the transparent tape, since any tilt in an R x or R z gate will reduce the accuracy of the results.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 3.3 The case of calcite · p. 10

    For calcite, the optical axis is not parallel to the naturally occurring faces of the crystal, but lies at an angle of about 44.6° relative to the surface normal.

    “for calcite, the optical axis is not parallel to the naturally occurring faces of the crystal [13], but instead lies at an angle of about 44.6 ◦ relative to the surface normal [18].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [13] Klein, 1993

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [18] Skalwold, 2015

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § 4.7 More precise birefringence determination · p. 22

    The sign of the angle is not important at this stage; only the circular polarization of light (|i> or |-i>) matters.

    “The sign of the angle is not yet important; only the circular polarization of light ( | i ⟩ or | -i ⟩ state) matters at this stage.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.6 Michel-L´ evy chart · p. 19

    The Michel-Lévy chart only provides a single birefringence value, so the measurement is by definition approximate for any material whose birefringence is wavelength-dependent.

    “The chart only provides a single birefringence value [13], and so the measurement is by definition approximate for any material whose birefringence is wavelength-dependent [12].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [13] Klein, 1993

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [12] Slepkov, 2022, Quantitative measurement of birefringence in transparent films across the visible spectrum, Am. J. Phys. source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisenone given
    § 4.5 Birefringence of transparent tape · p. 16

    Because the birefringence of a material depends on the wavelength of the photon passing through it, determining its value is important for finding the rotation induced by each layer of tape for a given laser.

    “Because the birefringence of a material depends on the wavelength of the photon passing through it, determining its value is important for finding the rotation induced by each layer of tape for a given laser.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 4.3 Rx and Rz implementation · p. 13

    As the two brands of tape have different rotation angles per layer, this results in twelve different rotation angles.

    “As the two brands of tape have different rotation angles per layer, this results in twelve different rotation angles.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § 4.7 More precise birefringence determination · p. 19

    The extinction angle is exactly 90° away from the angle of maximum intensity.

    “Since the extinction angle is exactly 90 ◦ away from the angle of maximum intensity”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 5.2 Deutsch algorithm implementation · p. 29

    The Deutsch algorithm is a simple quantum algorithm that demonstrates quantum advantage.

    “The Deutsch algorithm is a simple quantum algorithm that demonstrates quantum advantage [6].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [6] Nielsen, 2000

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.7 More precise birefringence determination · p. 22

    A reduction in birefringence for longer wavelengths has also been observed by Slepkov [12] for some transparent tapes.

    “A reduction in birefringence for longer wavelengths has also been observed by Slepkov [12] for some transparent tapes”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [12] Slepkov, 2022, Quantitative measurement of birefringence in transparent films across the visible spectrum, Am. J. Phys. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given
    § 4.10 CRx and CRy and CRz gates · p. 27

    The same idea of applying an Ry or Rz gate on only one of the two paths to create a CRy or CRz gate is valid.

    “The same idea of applying an R y or R z gate on only one of the two paths to create a CR y or CR z gate is also valid.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning
    § A.8 Polarizer as a measurement device · p. 35

    A polarizer does not correspond exactly to a true quantum measurement; a photon in the |-> state hitting a horizontal polarizer has a 50% chance of passing through as a horizontally polarized photon and a 50% chance of not passing through and being lost.

    “In reality, a single photon either passes through the polarizer or it is absorbed; one will never have a vertically polarized photon pass through a horizontal polarizer. So, a photon in the |-⟩ state that hits the polarizer will have a 50% chance of passing through (as a horizontally polarized photon) or a 50% chance of not passing through and being lost.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § 4.11 Measurement apparatus · p. 27

    Polarizing filters measure the polarization of a photon along a specific basis, and all photons exiting such a device are linearly polarized in the direction defined by the filter.

    “Polarizing filters provide the ability to measure the polarization of a photon along a specific basis. All photons exiting such a measurement device are always linearly polarized in the direction defined by the filter.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given
    § 5.1 Inverse gates · p. 28

    In quantum computing, all gates have an inverse that cancels the effect of the original gate when applied afterward.

    “In quantum computing, all gates have an inverse that cancels the effect of the original gate when applied afterward.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning
    § 4.9 Calcite crystal as a CNOT gate · p. 26

    In the calcite CNOT setup, if the photon's polarization is vertical (q0=|1>), the photon is deviated upward toward the optical axis (q1=|1>), whereas both qubits stay in |0> otherwise.

    “The physical explanation behind this behaviour is : if the polarization of the photon is vertical ( q 0 = | 1 ⟩ ), the photon is deviated upward toward the optical axis ( q 1 = | 1 ⟩ ), whereas both qubits stay in the | 0 ⟩ states otherwise .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § A.8 Polarizer as a measurement device · p. 36

    If gates create a |-> state, then with a horizontal polarizer only 0.5*10^15 photons pass through per second and the light looks half as bright.

    “If we set up the gates to create a |-⟩ state, we have 10 15 photons in the |-⟩ state per second (ignoring any photon losses up to this point). Then, for a horizontal polarizer, each photon has a 50% chance of passing through the polarizer. Thus, only 0 . 5 ∗ 10 15 photons pass through and the light looks half as bright.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisenone given
    § 5.2 Deutsch algorithm implementation · p. 29

    The Deutsch algorithm allows a single query to answer whether a transformation applied to two possible states is the same for both states or different for each state.

    “When an object can take two possible states (0 and 1) and a transformation is applied to it, the Deutsch algorithm allows us to use a single query to answer the question: ' Is the transformation applied to the two possible states the same, or is it different for each state? '”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § A.8 Polarizer as a measurement device · p. 36

    By rotating the polarizer to an arbitrary angle, one can measure any polarization on the x-z plane of the Bloch sphere.

    “Furthermore, we can rotate the polarizer to an arbitrary angle, which allows us to measure any polarization on the x-z plane of the Bloch sphere.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § 5.2 Deutsch algorithm implementation · p. 29

    If the transformation is the same for both states, the measured qubit yields |0>; if different, the result is |1>.

    “If the transformation is the same for both states (either both unchanged or both flipped), the measured qubit yields the result | 0 ⟩ . If the transformation is different for the two states (one flipped and the other unchanged), the result is | 1 ⟩ .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § 6 Conclusions · p. 30

    Transparent adhesive tape is birefringent, and syrup solutions are optically active.

    “We generated the light with a cat laser pointer and then manipulated these polarization states using transparent adhesive tape, which is birefringent, and syrup solutions, which are optically active.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § 5.1 Inverse gates · p. 28

    The Hadamard gate is its own inverse.

    “One may test inverse gates for all the R x , R y , and R z gates described earlier, as well as for the Hadamard gate, which is its own inverse..”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 6 Conclusions · p. 31

    The setup is well suited for at home or in-class implementation, allowing students even at the high school level to gain intuition about quantum computing via a tactile method.

    “Thus, this setup is well suited for at home or inclass implementation, allowing students even at the high school level to gain intuition about quantum computing via a tactile method.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning
    § 5.2 Deutsch algorithm implementation · p. 30

    A photon entering the Hadamard gate in the |+> state is transformed into |0>, whereas a photon entering in the |-> state is transformed into |1>.

    “A photon entering the Hadamard gate in the | + ⟩ state is transformed into the | 0 ⟩ state, whereas a photon entering in the |-⟩ state is transformed into the | 1 ⟩ state.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 5.2 Deutsch algorithm implementation · p. 30

    If the measured state is |0>, the transformation does not modify the initial state; if |1>, the transformation does change the initial state.

    “Thus, if we measure a | 0 ⟩ state, we know the transformation does not modify the initial state. For | 1 ⟩ , we know the transformation does change the initial state.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § 4.11 Measurement apparatus · p. 28

    For one-qubit systems, the screen together with a polarizing filter makes it possible to identify the angles of full extinction and to calculate the angle of maximum intensity.

    “For the one-qubit systems, the beam naturally produces a dot at a fixed location, but when used together with a polarizing filter, the screen makes it possible to identify the angles of full extinction and to calculate the angle of maximum intensity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.8 Hadamard gate: maple syrup, agave syrup, and transparent tape · p. 24

    The Hadamard gate can be described as a rotation of 180° about an axis oriented midway between the x- and z-axes.

    “The Hadamard gate is a very important quantum logic gate and can be described as a rotation of 180 ° about an axis oriented midway between the x - and z -axes [6]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [6] Nielsen, 2000

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 5.2 Deutsch algorithm implementation · p. 29

    Yoganathan [2] presented a YouTube demonstration of a modified version of the Deutsch algorithm that uses only a single qubit instead of two.

    “Yoganathan [2] presented a YouTube demonstration of a modified version of the Deutsch algorithm that uses only a single qubit instead of two in the original version [6].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [2] Yoganathan, 2023, What can my homemade quantum computer do?

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [6] Nielsen, 2000

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § 4.11 Measurement apparatus · p. 28

    A solid screen measures the position of light; for 2-qubit systems, laser beams are detected either on the lower path or on the upper path.

    “The screen measures the position of light. For the 2-qubit systems described earlier, the laser beams are detected either on the lower path or on the upper path.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 5.2 Deutsch algorithm implementation · p. 30

    The modified Deutsch algorithm does not identify which of the four specific gates was used, but it reliably determines whether the underlying rotation was about the x-axis or the z-axis.

    “Although this modified Deutsch algorithm does not identify which of the four specific gates was used, it reliably determines whether the underlying rotation was about the x -axis or the z -axis.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
59 of 59
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Manufacturing techniques for transparent tape are very stable and yield highly consistent products.

    “although the manufacturing techniques for transparent tape are very stable and yield highly consistent products”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The experimental precision of the setup is sufficient for a 182° rotation to be considered close enough to the ideal 180° Hadamard Z gate.

    “This 182 ° rotation is sufficiently close to the ideal 180 ° to remain well within the experimental precision of our setup.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The calcite crystal introduces an unknown phase φ between the |00> and |11> states.

    “In reality, the calcite crystal also adds an unknown phase ϕ between the two states.”
3 of 3

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Wrong equation cited for the minus state

    Minor

    Appendix A.7 cites Equation A1 for a system in the |-⟩ state, but Appendix A.3 identifies Equation A2 as the equation for that state.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Lefebvre, G.
Affiliations
Université de Sherbrooke (CA)
Corresponding author
Lefebvre, Ghislain
Venue
Physics Education
Published
2026-07-22
Volume
61
Issue
4
Pages
045049
ISSN
  • 0031-9120 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6552
OpenAlex
W7170090463
Cited by
0
References
12
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Open access
Locations
  • Physics Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Ministère de l’Économie, de l’Innovation et de l’Énergie du Québec
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
Keywords
photonic quantum computing, single-qubit gates, Hadamard gate, two-qubit gates, calcite crystals, birefringence, maple syrup, agave syrup, optical activity, polarization qubits, quantum algorithms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-23.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-23.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review