The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multispectral Mueller polarimetric imaging detecting residual cancer and cancer regression after neoadjuvant treatment for colorectal carcinomas
Open accessAbstract
This work is devoted to a first exploration of Mueller polarimetric imaging for the detection of residual cancer after neoadjuvant treatment for the rectum. Three samples of colorectal carcinomas treated by radiochemotherapy together with one untreated sample are analyzed ex vivo before fixation in formalin by using a multispectral Mueller polarimetric imaging system operated from 500 to 700 nm. The Mueller images, analyzed using the Lu-Chipmann decomposition, show negligible diattenuation and retardation. The nonirradiated rectum exhibits a variation of depolarization with cancer evolution stage. At all wavelengths on irradiated samples, the contrast between the footprint of the initial tumor and surrounding healthy tissue is found to be much smaller for complete tumor regression than when a residual tumor is present, even at volume fractions of the order of 5%. This high sensitivity is attributed to the modification of stromal collagen induced by the cancer. The depolarization contrast between treated cancer and healthy tissue is found to increase monotonously with the volume fraction of residual cancer in the red part of the spectrum. Polarimetric imaging is a promising technique for detecting short-time small residual cancers, which is valuable information for pathological diagnosis and patient management by clinicians.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Interpretation of Mueller matrices based on polar decomposition
Lu, S.-Y., & Chipman, R. A. (1996) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.13.001106 · Cited by 1,409
Cited by
Polarized light interaction with tissues
Tuchin, V. V. (2016) · Journal of Biomedical Optics · doi:10.1117/1.jbo.21.7.071114 · Cited by 384
Mueller polarimetric imaging for surgical and diagnostic applications: a review
Qi, J., & Elson, D. S. (2017) · Journal of Biophotonics · doi:10.1002/jbio.201600152 · Cited by 268
Polarimetric imaging of uterine cervix: a case study
Pierangelo, A., Nazac, A., Benali, A., Validire, P., Cohen, H., Novikova, T., Ibrahim, B. H., Manhas, S., Fallet, C., Antonelli, M.-R., et al. (2013) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.21.014120 · Cited by 255
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Pierangelo, A., Manhas, S., Benali, A., Fallet, C., Totobenazara, J.-L., Antonelli, M.-R., Novikova, T., Gayet, B., De Martino, A., & Validire, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomedical Optics
- Publisher
- SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng
- Published
- 2013-04-23
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 046014
- ISSN
- 1083-3668 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2031082546
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multispectral Mueller polarimetric imaging detecting residual cancer and cancer regression after neoadjuvant treatment for colorectal carcinomas. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1117/1.jbo.18.4.046014
- The paper
- Pierangelo, A., Manhas, S., Benali, A., Fallet, C., Totobenazara, J.-L., Antonelli, M.-R., Novikova, T., Gayet, B., De Martino, A., & Validire, P. (2013). Multispectral Mueller polarimetric imaging detecting residual cancer and cancer regression after neoadjuvant treatment for colorectal carcinomas. Journal of Biomedical Optics. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.jbo.18.4.046014
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.