The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mitosis detection in breast cancer pathology images by combining handcrafted and convolutional neural network features
Open accessAbstract
Breast cancer (BCa) grading plays an important role in predicting disease aggressiveness and patient outcome. A key component of BCa grade is the mitotic count, which involves quantifying the number of cells in the process of dividing (i.e., undergoing mitosis) at a specific point in time. Currently, mitosis counting is done manually by a pathologist looking at multiple high power fields (HPFs) on a glass slide under a microscope, an extremely laborious and time consuming process. The development of computerized systems for automated detection of mitotic nuclei, while highly desirable, is confounded by the highly variable shape and appearance of mitoses. Existing methods use either handcrafted features that capture certain morphological, statistical, or textural attributes of mitoses or features learned with convolutional neural networks (CNN). Although handcrafted features are inspired by the domain and the particular application, the data-driven CNN models tend to be domain agnostic and attempt to learn additional feature bases that cannot be represented through any of the handcrafted features. On the other hand, CNN is computationally more complex and needs a large number of labeled training instances. Since handcrafted features attempt to model domain pertinent attributes and CNN approaches are largely supervised feature generation methods, there is an appeal in attempting to combine these two distinct classes of feature generation strategies to create an integrated set of attributes that can potentially outperform either class of feature extraction strategies individually. We present a cascaded approach for mitosis detection that intelligently combines a CNN model and handcrafted features (morphology, color, and texture features). By employing a light CNN model, the proposed approach is far less demanding computationally, and the cascaded strategy of combining handcrafted features and CNN-derived features enables the possibility of maximizing the performance by leveraging the disconnected feature sets. Evaluation on the public ICPR12 mitosis dataset that has 226 mitoses annotated on 35 HPFs ([Formula: see text] magnification) by several pathologists and 15 testing HPFs yielded an [Formula: see text]-measure of 0.7345. Our approach is accurate, fast, and requires fewer computing resources compared to existent methods, making this feasible for clinical use.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition
Lecun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., & Haffner, P. (1998) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.726791 · Cited by 58,805
SMOTE synthetic minority over-sampling technique
Chawla, N. V., Bowyer, K. W., Hall, L. O., & Kegelmeyer, W. P. (2002) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.953 · Cited by 32,865
Textural Features for Image Classification
Haralick, R. M., Shanmugam, K., & Dinstein, I. (1973) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tsmc.1973.4309314 · Cited by 22,886
LIII. On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space
Pearson, K. (1901) · The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science · doi:10.1080/14786440109462720 · Cited by 11,934
ELSTON, C. W., & ELLIS, I. O. (1991) · Histopathology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2559.1991.tb00229.x · Cited by 6,175
Bloom, H. J. G., & Richardson, W. W. (1957) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/bjc.1957.43 · Cited by 2,925
Texture analysis using gray level run lengths
Galloway, M. M. (1975) · Computer Graphics and Image Processing · doi:10.1016/s0146-664x(75)80008-6 · Cited by 2,141
Histopathological Image Analysis: A Review
Gurcan, M. N., Boucheron, L. E., Can, A., Madabhushi, A., Rajpoot, N. M., & Yener, B. (2009) · IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/rbme.2009.2034865 · Cited by 2,052
Self-citationPathological prognostic factors in breast cancer
Elston, C. (1999) · Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology · doi:10.1016/s1040-8428(99)00034-7 · Cited by 1,735
Mitosis Detection in Breast Cancer Histology Images with Deep Neural Networks
Cireşan, D. C., Giusti, A., Gambardella, L. M., & Schmidhuber, J. (2013) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-40763-5_51 · Cited by 1,536
Cited by
A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis
Litjens, G., Kooi, T., Bejnordi, B. E., Setio, A. A. A., Ciompi, F., Ghafoorian, M., van der Laak, J. A. W. M., van Ginneken, B., & Sánchez, C. I. (2017) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2017.07.005 · Cited by 15,332
Artificial intelligence in digital pathology — new tools for diagnosis and precision oncology
Bera, K., Schalper, K. A., Rimm, D. L., Velcheti, V., & Madabhushi, A. (2019) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41571-019-0252-y · Cited by 1,698
Self-citationDeep learning-enabled medical computer vision
Esteva, A., Chou, K., Yeung, S., Naik, N., Madani, A., Mottaghi, A., Liu, Y., Topol, E., Dean, J., & Socher, R. (2021) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-020-00376-2 · Cited by 1,406
Deep learning for digital pathology image analysis: A comprehensive tutorial with selected use cases
Janowczyk, A., & Madabhushi, A. (2016) · Journal of Pathology Informatics · doi:10.4103/2153-3539.186902 · Cited by 1,348
Self-citationNorouzzadeh, M. S., Nguyen, A., Kosmala, M., Swanson, A., Palmer, M. S., Packer, C., & Clune, J. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1719367115 · Cited by 1,230
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, H., Cruz-Roa, A., Basavanhally, A., Gilmore, H., Shih, N., Feldman, M., Tomaszewski, J., Gonzalez, F., & Madabhushi, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Medical Imaging
- Publisher
- SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng
- Published
- 2014-10-10
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 034003
- ISSN
- 2329-4302 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2103061399
- Cited by
- 349
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 22.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mitosis detection in breast cancer pathology images by combining handcrafted and convolutional neural network features. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1117/1.jmi.1.3.034003
- The paper
- Wang, H., Cruz-Roa, A., Basavanhally, A., Gilmore, H., Shih, N., Feldman, M., Tomaszewski, J., Gonzalez, F., & Madabhushi, A. (2014). Mitosis detection in breast cancer pathology images by combining handcrafted and convolutional neural network features. Journal of Medical Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.jmi.1.3.034003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.