An end-to-end communications architecture for condition-based maintenance applications
Abstract
This paper explores challenges in implementing an end-to-end communications architecture for Condition-Based Maintenance Plus (CBM+) data transmission which aligns with the Army's Network Modernization Strategy. The Army's Network Modernization strategy is based on rolling out network capabilities which connect the smallest unit and Soldier level to enterprise systems. CBM+ is a continuous improvement initiative over the life cycle of a weapon system or equipment to improve the reliability and maintenance effectiveness of Department of Defense (DoD) systems. CBM+ depends on the collection, processing and transport of large volumes of data. An important capability that enables CBM+ is an end-to-end network architecture that enables data to be uploaded from the platform at the tactical level to enterprise data analysis tools. To connect end-to-end maintenance processes in the Army's supply chain, a CBM+ network capability can be developed from available network capabilities.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Condition-Based Maintenance is a proactive approach that utilizes real-time monitoring of equipment conditions to assess and determine the necessity for maintenance.
“CBM is a proactive approach that utilizes real-time monitoring of equipment conditions to assess and determine the necessity for maintenance (Golmakani, 2022;Kroculick, 2014;de Meyer, Goosen, van Rensburg, du Plessis and van Laar, 2021).”
From Impact of Sensor Degradation on Measurement Uncertainty in Prognostics and Maintenance Decision-Making: (2025) · cites this paper as Kroculick, 2014
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Thai, T.-T. N., Do, P., Iung, B., & Gardoni, P. (2025) · International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management · doi:10.36001/ijphm.2025.v16i4.4306 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kroculick, J.
- Corresponding author
- Kroculick, Joseph
- ORCID
- Kroculick, Joseph
- Venue
- SPIE Proceedings
- Publisher
- SPIE
- Published
- 2014-06-17
- Volume
- 9096
- Pages
- 909607
- ISSN
- 0277-786X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2035943498
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 0.56
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Military Technology and Strategies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Military Strategy and Technology
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Reliability and Maintenance Optimization
- Keywords
- data transmission, weapon system maintenance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
