Cited by 35

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quality labeled faces in the wild (QLFW): a database for studying face recognition in real-world environments

Karam, Lina J., Zhu, Tong·2015·SPIE Proceedings

Abstract

The varying quality of face images is an important challenge that limits the effectiveness of face recognition technology when applied in real-world applications. Existing face image databases do not consider the effect of distortions that commonly occur in real-world environments. This database (QLFW) represents an initial attempt to provide a set of labeled face images spanning the wide range of quality, from no perceived impairment to strong perceived impairment for face detection and face recognition applications. Types of impairment include JPEG2000 compression, JPEG compression, additive white noise, Gaussian blur and contrast change. Subjective experiments are conducted to assess the perceived visual quality of faces under different levels and types of distortions and also to assess the human recognition performance under the considered distortions. One goal of this work is to enable automated performance evaluation of face recognition technologies in the presence of different types and levels of visual distortions. This will consequently enable the development of face recognition systems that can operate reliably on real-world visual content in the presence of real-world visual distortions. Another goal is to enable the development and assessment of visual quality metrics for face images and for face detection and recognition applications.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1117/12.2080393

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Population homogeneity can be problematic for classification schemes, since high prevalence of a feature classification in a given population could result in an overlapping score, leading to erroneous false positive matches.

    “Population homogeneity, however, can be problematic for classification schemes, since high prevalence of a feature classification in a given population could result in an overlapping score, leading to erroneous false positive matches [60].”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. D. S. Taubman and M. W. Marcellin, JPEG2000 : image compression fundamentals, standards, and practice, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 2002. · DOI
  2. 10.1109/83.841940 · DOI
  3. 10.1109/TIP.2005.859389 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Karam, L. J., & Zhu, T.
Venue
SPIE Proceedings
Publisher
SPIE
Published
2015-03-17
Volume
9394
Pages
93940B
ISSN
0277-786X
Cited by
35
References
2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review