The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Computer aided lung cancer diagnosis with deep learning algorithms
Abstract
Deep learning is considered as a popular and powerful method in pattern recognition and classification. However, there are not many deep structured applications used in medical imaging diagnosis area, because large dataset is not always available for medical images. In this study we tested the feasibility of using deep learning algorithms for lung cancer diagnosis with the cases from Lung Image Database Consortium (LIDC) database. The nodules on each computed tomography (CT) slice were segmented according to marks provided by the radiologists. After down sampling and rotating we acquired 174412 samples with 52 by 52 pixel each and the corresponding truth files. Three deep learning algorithms were designed and implemented, including Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Deep Belief Networks (DBNs), Stacked Denoising Autoencoder (SDAE). To compare the performance of deep learning algorithms with traditional computer aided diagnosis (CADx) system, we designed a scheme with 28 image features and support vector machine. The accuracies of CNN, DBNs, and SDAE are 0.7976, 0.8119, and 0.7929, respectively; the accuracy of our designed traditional CADx is 0.7940, which is slightly lower than CNN and DBNs. We also noticed that the mislabeled nodules using DBNs are 4% larger than using traditional CADx, this might be resulting from down sampling process lost some size information of the nodules.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
Greedy layer-wise training of deep networks
Bengio, Y., Lamblin, P., Popovici, D., & Larochelle, H. (2007) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 19 · doi:10.7551/mitpress/7503.003.0024 · Cited by 4,841
Cited by
A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis
Litjens, G., Kooi, T., Bejnordi, B. E., Setio, A. A. A., Ciompi, F., Ghafoorian, M., van der Laak, J. A. W. M., van Ginneken, B., & Sánchez, C. I. (2017) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2017.07.005 · Cited by 15,332
The present and future of deep learning in radiology
Saba, L., Biswas, M., Kuppili, V., Cuadrado Godia, E., Suri, H. S., Edla, D. R., Omerzu, T., Laird, J. R., Khanna, N. N., Mavrogeni, S., et al. (2019) · European Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.02.038 · Cited by 353
A systematic survey of computer-aided diagnosis in medicine: Past and present developments
Yanase, J., & Triantaphyllou, E. (2019) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2019.112821 · Cited by 303
AI Advances in ICU with an Emphasis on Sepsis Prediction: An Overview
Stylianides, C., Nicolaou, A., Sulaiman, W. A., Alexandropoulou, C.-A., Panagiotopoulos, I., Karathanasopoulou, K., Dimitrakopoulos, G., Kleanthous, S., Politi, E., Ntalaperas, D., et al. (2025) · Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction · doi:10.3390/make7010006 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Sun, W., Zheng, B., & Qian, W.
- Venue
- SPIE Proceedings
- Publisher
- SPIE
- Published
- 2016-03-24
- Volume
- 9785
- Pages
- 97850Z
- ISSN
- 0277-786X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2311857205
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.34
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Computer aided lung cancer diagnosis with deep learning algorithms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1117/12.2216307
- The paper
- Sun, W., Zheng, B., & Qian, W. (2016). Computer aided lung cancer diagnosis with deep learning algorithms. SPIE Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2216307
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.