Cited by 303Artificial Intelligence in HealthcareArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationTechnology and Human Factors in Education and Health

A systematic survey of computer-aided diagnosis in medicine: Past and present developments

Open access
Yanase, Juri, Triantaphyllou, Evangelos·2019·Expert Systems with Applications

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eswa.2019.112821

Cites

254 of 254 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

11 of the 265 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yanase, J., & Triantaphyllou, E.
Affiliations
Louisiana State University (US)
Corresponding author
Triantaphyllou, Evangelos
Venue
Expert Systems with Applications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-12
Volume
138
Pages
112821
ISSN
0957-4174 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2959687571
Cited by
303
References
265
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 3
FWCI
35.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Expert Systems with Applications (publishedVersion)
  • Civil War Book Review (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Technology and Human Factors in Education and Health
Keywords
computer-aided diagnosis, expert systems, intelligent systems, medical data processing, clinical decision-making

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review