Cited by 15Astronomy and Astrophysical ResearchScientific Computing and Data ManagementAstronomical Observations and Instrumentation

Investigating interoperability of the LSST data management software stack with Astropy

Open access
Jenness, Tim, Bosch, James, Owen, Russell, Parejko, John, Sick, Jonathan, Swinbank, John, de Val-Borro, Miguel, Dubois-Felsmann, Gregory +5 more·2016·SPIE Proceedings

Abstract

The Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) will be an 8.4m optical survey telescope sited in Chile and capable of imaging the entire sky twice a week. The data rate of approximately 15TB per night and the requirements to both issue alerts on transient sources within 60 seconds of observing and create annual data releases means that automated data management systems and data processing pipelines are a key deliverable of the LSST construction project. The LSST data management software has been in development since 2004 and is based on a C++ core with a Python control layer. The software consists of nearly a quarter of a million lines of code covering the system from fundamental WCS and table libraries to pipeline environments and distributed process execution. The Astropy project began in 2011 as an attempt to bring together disparate open source Python projects and build a core standard infrastructure that can be used and built upon by the astronomy community. This project has been phenomenally successful in the years since it has begun and has grown to be the de facto standard for Python software in astronomy. Astropy brings with it considerable expectations from the community on how astronomy Python software should be developed and it is clear that by the time LSST is fully operational in the 2020s many of the prospective users of the LSST software stack will expect it to be fully interoperable with Astropy. In this paper we describe the overlap between the LSST science pipeline software and Astropy software and investigate areas where the LSST software provides new functionality. We also discuss the possibilities of re-engineering the LSST science pipeline software to build upon Astropy, including the option of contributing affliated packages.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1117/12.2231313

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The LSST Science Platform builds on recent trends in remote data analysis and experiences from JHU SciServer, Gaia GAVIP, and NOAO Datalab.

    “It builds on recent trends in remote data analysis and practical experiences in the astronomical context gathered by projects such as the JHU SciServer ( Raddick et al. 2017 ) , Gaia GAVIP ( Vagg et al. 2016 ) , or NOAO Datalab ( Fitzpatrick et al. 2016 ) .”

    From LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products (2019) · cites this paper as Fitzpatrick et al. 2016

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 62 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Kahn, S., "Final design of the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope," in [Ground-Based and Airborne Telescopes IV], Hall, H. J., Gilmozzi, R., and Marshall, H. K., eds., Proc. SPIE 9906, in press (2016).
  2. DiBona, C., Cooper, D., and Stone, M., eds., [Open Sources 2.0: The Continuing Evolution ], O'Reilly (2006). ISBN 0-596-00802-3.
  3. Draper, P. W., Berry, D. S., Jenness, T., and Economou, F., "GAIA -Version 4," in [Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XVIII], Bohlender, D. A., Durand, D., and Dowler, P., eds., ASP Conf. Ser. 411, 575 (Sept. 2009).
  4. Currie, M. J., Berry, D. S., Jenness, T., Gibb, A. G., Bell, G. S., and Draper, P. W., "Starlink Software in 2013," in [Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XXIII ], Manset, N. and Forshay, P., eds., ASP Conf. Ser. 485, 391 (May 2014).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jenness, T., Bosch, J., Owen, R., Parejko, J., Sick, J., Swinbank, J., de Val-Borro, M., Dubois-Felsmann, G., Lim, K.-T., Lupton, R. H., Schellart, P., Krughoff, K. S., & Tollerud, E. J.
Affiliations
  • LSST (United States)
  • Princeton University (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Princeton Univ. (United States)
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
  • SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory (US)
  • Space Telescope Science Institute (US)
Venue
SPIE Proceedings
Publisher
SPIE
Published
2016-07-26
Volume
9913
Pages
99130G
ISSN
0277-786X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2496031908
Cited by
14
References
62
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4
FWCI
2.75
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE (publishedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1227061)
  • U.S. Department of Energy (76SF00515, DE–AC02–76SF00515, AC02‐76SF00515, DE-AC02-)
  • University of Washington
  • SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory (DEAC02−76SF00515, AC02‐76SF00515)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Scientific Computing and Data Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Astronomical Observations and Instrumentation
Keywords
LSST, astropy, software interoperability, software reengineering, transient alerts, data release

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review