GAVIP: a platform for Gaia data analysis
Open accessAbstract
Gaia is a major European Space Agency (ESA) astrophysics mission designed to map and analyse 109 stars, ultimately generating more than 1 PetaByte of data-products. As Gaia data becomes publicly available and reaches a wider audience, there is an increasing need to facilitate the further use of Gaia products without needing to download large datasets. The Gaia Added Value Interface Platform (GAVIP) is designed to address this challenge by providing an innovative platform within which scientists can submit and deploy code, packaged as "Added Value Interfaces" (AVIs), which will be executed close to the data. Deployed AVIs and associated outputs may also be made available to other GAVIP platform users, thus providing a mechanism for scientific experiment reproducibility. This paper describes the capabilities and features of GAVIP.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The LSST Science Platform builds on recent trends in remote data analysis and experiences from JHU SciServer, Gaia GAVIP, and NOAO Datalab.
“It builds on recent trends in remote data analysis and practical experiences in the astronomical context gathered by projects such as the JHU SciServer ( Raddick et al. 2017 ) , Gaia GAVIP ( Vagg et al. 2016 ) , or NOAO Datalab ( Fitzpatrick et al. 2016 ) .”
From LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products (2019) · cites this paper as Vagg et al. 2016
Cites
The NumPy Array: A Structure for Efficient Numerical Computation
van der Walt, S., Colbert, S. C., & Varoquaux, G. P. (2011) · Computing in Science & Engineering · doi:10.1109/mcse.2011.37 · Cited by 10,445 · see citing works
(2010) · Cited by 4,411 · see citing works
Docker: lightweight Linux containers for consistent development and deployment
Merkel, D. (2014) · Linux journal · Cited by 3,277 · see citing works
White, T. (2009) · Cited by 2,705 · see citing works
Apache Hadoop YARN: yet another resource negotiator
Vavilapalli, V. K., Murthy, A. C., Douglas, C., Agarwal, S., Konar, M., Evans, R., Graves, T., Lowe, J., Shah, H., Seth, S., et al. (2013) · Proceedings of the 4th annual Symposium on Cloud Computing · doi:10.1145/2523616.2523633 · Cited by 1,848 · see citing works
The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework
(2012) · doi:10.17487/rfc6749 · Cited by 1,383 · see citing works
GAIA: Composition, formation and evolution of the Galaxy
Perryman, M. A. C., de Boer, K. S., Gilmore, G. F., Høg, E., Lattanzi, M. G., Lindegren, L., Luri, X., Mignard, F., Pace, O., & de Zeeuw, P. T. (2001) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20010085 · Cited by 1,103 · see citing works
The Pan-STARRS wide-field optical/NIR imaging survey
Kaiser, N., Burgett, W., Chambers, K., Denneau, L., Heasley, J., Jedicke, R., Magnier, E., Morgan, J., Onaka, P., & Tonry, J. (2010) · SPIE Proceedings · doi:10.1117/12.859188 · Cited by 508 · see citing works
Proceedings of the 4th annual Symposium on Cloud Computing
(2013) · doi:10.1145/2523616 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Overview and stellar statistics of the expectedGaiaCatalogue using theGaiaObject Generator
Luri, X., Palmer, M., Arenou, F., Masana, E., de Bruijne, J. H. J., Antiche, E., Babusiaux, C., Borrachero, R., Sartoretti, P., Julbé, F., et al. (2014) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201423636 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Supernovae with ‘super-Hipparcos’
Belokurov, V. A., & Evans, N. W. (2003) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06427.x · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Altavilla, G., Botticella, M. T., Cappellaro, E., & Turatto, M. (2012) · Astrophysics and Space Science · doi:10.1007/s10509-012-1017-6 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Overview and stellar statistics of the expected Gaia Catalogue using the Gaia Object Generator
Palmer, M., Luri, X., Arenou, F., et al. (2015) · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products
Ivezić, Ž., Kahn, S. M., Tyson, J. A., Abel, B., Acosta, E., Allsman, R., Alonso, D., AlSayyad, Y., Anderson, S. F., Andrew, J., et al. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab042c · Cited by 4,357 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Vagg, D., O'Callaghan, D., Ó hÓgáin, F., McBreen, S., Hanlon, L., Lynn, D., & O'Mullane, W.
- Affiliations
- University College Dublin (IE)
- Univ. College Dublin (Ireland)
- European Space Astronomy Ctr. (Spain)
- Venue
- SPIE Proceedings
- Publisher
- SPIE
- Published
- 2016-07-26
- Volume
- 9913
- Pages
- 99131V
- ISSN
- 0277-786X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2416045168
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 13
- Citations by year
- 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 3
- FWCI
- 3.29
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Scientific Computing and Data Management
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
- Keywords
- Gaia mission, scientific reproducibility
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
