Cited by 4Calibration and Measurement TechniquesSpacecraft Design and TechnologyAtmospheric aerosols and clouds

Orbital variations and impacts on observations from SNPP, NOAA 18-20, and AQUA sun-synchronous satellites

Open access
Shao, Xi, Cao, Changyong, Xiong, Xiaoxiong, Zhang, Bin, Uprety, Sirish, Liu, Tung-Chang·2018·Earth Observing Systems XXIII

Abstract

The AQUA, SNPP, and NOAA 18-20 PM sun-synchronous satellites were designed with similar local time, local solar zenith angles, and overlapping temporal coverage. Although the satellites are expected to have fixed local equator- crossing time, during the satellite lifetime, the equator-crossing times of these satellites drift. For NOAA 18-19, the drift in equator-crossing time is significant (few hours) and no correction has been done over the lifetime. For SNPP and AQUA, correction in the orbital inclination angle was periodically performed to maintain the equator-crossing time around the designed value. The impact of systematic drift of the local observation time during the satellite life cycle can be significant and should be accounted for when using multi-year time series of satellite products in long-term environmental studies. In this paper, the equator-crossing time drift of AQUA, SNPP, and NOAA 18-20, the correction of SNPP and AQUA equator-crossing time via orbital inclination angle change, and the consequent local solar zenith angle variation are evaluated. The impact of such drift on low-latitude mean brightness temperature trend derived from the similar ~11 μm thermal emissive channel of AQUA MODIS CH31, SNPP Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) CH15 and NOAA 18-19 HIRS CH08 are analyzed. The drift in the mean brightness temperature measured by these sensors is combined as a function of local time and analyzed using diurnal cycle analysis. The mean brightness temperature drift for SNPP VIIRS is reconciled within the context of much larger temperature drift of NOAA 18-19.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1117/12.2323012

Cites

9 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 9 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 2 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingnone given

    Follow-up adjustments were applied in ~ yearly interval to maintain the equator-crossing time of SNPP around 13:25 PM.

    “The follow-up adjustments were applied in ~ yearly interval to maintain the equator-crossing time of SNPP around 13:25 PM.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingreasoning

    Due to lack of orbital correction, the equator-crossing time of NOAA 18-19 is the most significant.

    “Due to lack of orbital correction, the equator-crossing time of NOAA 18-19 is the most significant.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingnone given

    There is no orbital correction for NOAA 19.

    “There is no orbital correction for NOAA 19.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingnone given

    Due to the orbital drift of NOAA18, its equator-crossing time of ascending orbit drifted from its initial location at ~ 14:00 PM to 19:30 PM in late 2017 when NOAA 18 satellite became terminator crossing satellite.

    “Due to the orbital drift of NOAA18, its equator-crossing time of ascending orbit drifted from its initial location at ~ 14:00 PM to 19:30 PM in late 2017 when NOAA 18 satellite became terminator crossing satellite.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Since its launch, the equator-crossing time of NOAA 18 drifts from initial 14:00 PM to 13:30 PM and then to ~19:50 PM, i.e. terminator orbit.

    “Since its launch, the equator-crossing time of NOAA 18 drifts from initial 14:00 PM to 13:30 PM and then to ~19:50 PM, i.e. terminator orbit.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 11
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Over six years since 2012, NOAA 19 equator-crossing time drifts about 2.5 hours as the orbital inclination angle continuously increases from 98.85 degree to 99.09 degree.

    “Over six years since 2012, NOAA 19 equator-crossing time drifts about 2.5 hours as the orbital inclination angle continuously increases from 98.85 degree to 99.09 degree as shown in Figure 3.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    The variation of the solar zenith angle peaked with a maximum of ~ 2.5 degree in late 2014 which corresponds to the equator-crossing time drift of ~10 min.

    “The variation of the solar zenith angle peaked with a maximum of ~ 2.5 degree in late 2014 which corresponds to the equator-crossing time drift of ~10 min.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The equator-crossing time of SNPP drifts from initial 13:25 PM to as large as 13:33 PM in late 2014 and the corresponding orbital inclination angle changes from 98.675 degree to 98.79 degree.

    “The equator-crossing time of SNPP drifts from initial 13:25 PM to as large as 13:33 PM in late 2014 and the corresponding orbital inclination angle changes from 98.675 degree to 98.79 degree.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The orbital adjustment of AQUA occurs yearly which helps maintain a tighter equator-crossing time drift than SNPP.

    “The orbital adjustment of AUQA occurs yearly which helps maintain a tighter equator-crossing time drift than SNPP.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    For NOAA 18-19, the drift in equator-crossing time is significant (few hours) and no correction has been done over the lifetime.

    “For NOAA 18-19, the drift in equator-crossing time is significant (few hours) and no correction has been done over the lifetime.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The latitude region in the southern hemisphere has higher solar zenith angle, which is due to the inclination of the satellite orbital plane.

    “The latitude region in the southern hemisphere has higher solar zenith angle, which is due to the inclination of the satellite orbital plane.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Four consecutive orbital adjustments were applied in late 2014 to bring the orbital inclination angle to 98.68 degree and the equator-crossing time drifted afterwards toward 13:25 PM.

    “Four consecutive orbital adjustments were applied in late 2014 to bring the orbital inclination angle to 98.68 degree and the equator-crossing time drifted afterwards toward 13:25 PM.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    For AQUA, the orbital inclination angle was maintained between 98.19 and 98.23 degree and when the inclination angle approached 98.23 degree, four to five consecutive orbital adjustments were performed to maintain the equator-crossing time around the designed value.

    “For AQUA, the orbital inclination angle was maintained between 98.19 and 98.23 degree and when the inclination angle approached 98.23 degree, four to five consecutive orbital adjustments were performed to maintain the equator-crossing time around the designed value.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Both NOAA 18 and 19 show continuous decreasing and increasing trend in the data collected during ascending and descending orbit, respectively.

    “Both show continuous decreasing and increasing trend in the data collected during ascending and descending orbit, respectively.”
    • Also stated in: § 5. SUMMARY · plain
      “The long term low latitude mean BT of NOAA 18 and 19 showed continuous decreasing and increasing trend for the data collected during ascending and descending orbit, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Their orbital inclination angle continues to increase together with the equator-crossing time drifting toward terminator orbit.

    “Their orbital inclination angle continues to increase together with the equator-crossing time drifting toward terminator orbit.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    The BT sampled during ascending orbit continued to decrease while the BT sampled during descending orbit continued to increase.

    “The BT sampled during ascending orbit continued to decrease while the BT sampled during descending orbit continued to increase.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
11 of 11
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The AQUA, SNPP, and NOAA 18-20 PM sun-synchronous satellites were designed with similar local time, local solar zenith angles, and overlapping temporal coverage.

    “The AQUA, SNPP, and NOAA 18-20 PM sun-synchronous satellites were designed with similar local time, local solar zenith angles, and overlapping temporal coverage.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The ~11 µm channel is primarily used for surface temperature retrieval.

    “This ~11 µm channel is primarily used for surface temperature retrieval.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The local solar zenith angle has large annual variation due to the annual variation in the solar declination angle, which can mask the embedded small solar zenith angle change due to the orbital drift.

    “The local solar zenith angle has large annual variation due to the annual variation in the solar declination angle, which can mask the embedded small solar zenith angle change due to the orbital drift.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    By averaging the BT in low latitude region consisting of both northern and southern hemisphere, the annual cycle oscillation in BT can be canceled out to certain extent.

    “By averaging the BT in low latitude region consisting of both northern and southern hemisphere, the annual cycle oscillation in BT can be canceled out to certain extent.”
4 of 4

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

9 of the 9 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shao, X., Cao, C., Xiong, X., Zhang, B., Uprety, S., & Liu, T.-C.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US)
  • Goddard Space Flight Center (US)
  • Earth Resources Technology (United States) (US)
Venue
Earth Observing Systems XXIII
Publisher
SPIE
Published
2018-09-07
Pages
66
OpenAlex
W2892270744
Cited by
4
References
9
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2020: 3
FWCI
1.30
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Earth Observing Systems (publishedVersion)
  • NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) (submittedVersion)
  • NOAA Institutional Repository (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Calibration and Measurement Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Design and Technology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
Keywords
sun-synchronous satellites, thermal infrared radiometry, MODIS Aqua

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review