Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 39Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationSoftware Testing and Debugging Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Interpretable explanations of black box classifiers applied on medical images by meaningful perturbations using variational autoencoders

Uzunova, Hristina, Ehrhardt, Jan, Kepp, Timo, Handels, Heinz·2019·Medical Imaging 2019: Image Processing

Abstract

The growing popularity of black box machine learning methods for medical image analysis makes their interpretability to a crucial task. To make a system, e.g. a trained neural network, trustworthy for a clinician, it needs to be able to explain its decisions and predictions. In this work, we tackle the problem of generating plausible explanations for the predictions of medical image classifiers, that are trained to differentiate between different types of pathologies and healthy tissues. An intuitive solution to determine which image regions influence the trained classifier is to find out whether the classification results change when those regions are deleted. This idea can be formulated as a minimization problem and thus efficiently implemented. However, the meaning of “deletion” of image regions, in our case pathologies in medical images, is not defined. We contribute by defining the deletion of pathologies, as the replacement by their healthy looking equivalent generated using variational autoencoders. The experiments with a classification neural network on OCT (Optical Coherence Tomography) images and brain lesion MRIs show that a meaningful replacement of “deleted” image regions has significant impact on the reliability of the generated explanations. The proposed deletion method is proven to be successful since our approach delivers the best results compared to four other established methods.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1117/12.2511964

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Springenberg, 2015, Striving for simplicity: The all convolutional net
  2. Selvaraju, 2017, Grad-cam: Visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization, 618, 10.1109/ICCV.2017.74 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1109/ICCV.2017.371 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1007/978-3-662-56537-7 · DOI
  5. Kingma, 2013, Auto-encoding variational bayes.
  6. Huang, 2017, Densely connected convolutional networks, 2261
  7. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.07.013 · DOI
  8. Dabov, K., Foi, A., Katkovnik, V., and Egiazarian, K., “Image denoising by sparse 3-d transformdomain collaborative filtering,” Trans. Img. Proc. 16, 2080–2095 (Aug. 2007). · DOI · Paper page
  9. Shattuck, D. W., Mirza, M., Adisetiyo, V., Hojatkashani, C., Salamon, G., Narr, K. L., Poldrack, R. A., Bilder, R. M., and Toga, A. W., “Construction of a 3d probabilistic atlas of human cortical structures,” NeuroImage 39 (2008). · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.media.2016.07.009 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Uzunova, H., Ehrhardt, J., Kepp, T., & Handels, H.
Affiliations
University of Lübeck (DE)
Venue
Medical Imaging 2019: Image Processing
Publisher
SPIE
Published
2019-03-15
Pages
36
OpenAlex
W2911447638
Cited by
39
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.88
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
SPIE Medical Imaging: Image Processing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
Keywords
explainable AI, black-box classifiers, medical image classification, variational autoencoder, optical coherence tomography, interpretability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review