Cited by 53AI in cancer detectionCell Image Analysis TechniquesDigital Imaging for Blood Diseases

Histographs: graphs in histopathology

Anand, Deepak, Gadiya, Shrey, Sethi, Amit·2020·Medical Imaging 2020: Digital Pathology

Abstract

Spatial arrangement of cells of various types, such as tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and the advancing edge of a tumor, are important features for detecting and characterizing cancers. However, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) do not explicitly extract intricate features of the spatial arrangements of the cells from histopathology images. In this work, we propose to classify cancers using graph convolutional networks (GCNs) by modeling a tissue section as a multi-attributed multi-relational spatial graph of its constituent cells. Cells are detected using their nuclei in H and E stained tissue image, and each cell’s appearance is captured as a multi-attributed high-dimensional vertex feature. The spatial relations between neighboring cells are captured as edge features based on their distances in a multi-relational graph. We demonstrate the utility of this approach by obtaining classification accuracy that is competitive with CNNs, specifically, Inception-v3, on two tasks – cancerous versus non-cancerous and in situ versus invasive – on the BACH breast cancer dataset.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1117/12.2550114

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Protein structure representations generated by graph convolutions combined with protein sequence representations can predict the probability of compound-protein interactions.

    “To be flexible with other graph- and non-graph-based methods, protein structure representations generated by graph convolutions has been combined with protein sequence representations (e.g., shallow network embedding methods or CNNs) to predict the probability of compound-protein interactions [174, 175, 176, 177].”

    From Graph representation learning in biomedicine and healthcare (2022) · cites this paper as [177]

  • Fusing compound sequence, structure, and clinical implications has significantly improved drug-drug and drug-target interaction predictions.

    “Fusing compound sequence, structure, and clinical implications has significantly improved drug-drug and drug-target interaction predictions.”

    From Graph representation learning in biomedicine and healthcare (2022) · cites this paper as [177]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anand, D., Gadiya, S., & Sethi, A.
Affiliations
Indian Institute of Technology Bombay (IN)
Venue
Medical Imaging 2020: Digital Pathology
Publisher
SPIE
Published
2020-03-16
Pages
23
OpenAlex
W3010855850
Cited by
53
References
7
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4
FWCI
3.63
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
SPIE Medical Imaging: Digital and Computational Pathology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Imaging for Blood Diseases
Keywords
histopathological images, graph convolutional networks, cancer classification, breast cancer, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, tumor edge, nuclei detection, H&E staining, BACH dataset

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review