The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
TensorRT-based surgical instrument detection assessment for deep learning on edge computing
Abstract
The rise of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) can mainly be attributed to the exponential growth in technology and the evolution of laparoscopic instrumentation over the past two decades. However, advanced technologies in the Operating Theatre, such as imaging systems, robotics, computer assistance, navigation, and monitoring, involve significant effort and a very high level of training and education. Deep Learning has had a major impact on a range of surgical procedures, such as optimizing workflow, surgical training, intraoperative assistance, patient safety, and efficiency. However, it also requires high computational and memory resources. There has been a lot of research into optimizing deep learning models to balance performance and accuracy under limited resources. Techniques like post-training quantization can significantly reduce model size and latency. In this paper, we explore TensorRT-based techniques on edge devices to achieve real-time inference without compromising accuracy under limited compute. For this purpose, a YOLOv5 model is pretrained on M2CAI 2016, to detect and recognize surgical instruments in Laparoscopy and evaluated using mean average precision (mAP) and inference time. We deployed object detection models on an edge device to test real-time performance, exploring the trade-off between accuracy and speed. This paper gives a review looking at how deep learning and edge computing intersect and how to optimize deep learning for edge devices with limited…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“State-of-the-art studies have shown that converting models to TensorRT engines significantly improves inference speed and reduces latency [5,27], crucial for real-time applications [54].”
From Benchmarking YOLOv8 Variants for Object Detection Efficiency on Jetson Orin NX for Edge Computing Applications (2026) · cites this paper as [54]
Citations
Cites
Integer Quantization for Deep Learning Inference: Principles and Empirical Evaluation
Wu, H., Judd, P., Zhang, X., Isaev, M., & Micikevicius, P. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2004.09602 · Cited by 246
Research works printed but not linked: 6
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Aljami, H. M., Alrowais, N. A., AlAwajy, A. M., Alhrgan, S. O., Aldwaani, R. A., Alsawadi, M. S., Saqib, N. U., Alam, S. S., & Alsubaie, R. (2026) · Computers · doi:10.3390/computers15020074 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Belhaoua, A., Kimpe, T. R., & Crul, S.
- Affiliations
- Barco (Belgium) (BE)
- ORCID
- Kimpe, Tom R.
- Venue
- Medical Imaging 2024: Image-Guided Procedures, Robotic Interventions, and Modeling
- Publisher
- SPIE
- Published
- 2024-03-29
- Pages
- 58
- OpenAlex
- W4391908362
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 0.83
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- SPIE Medical Imaging: Image-Guided Procedures, Robotic Interventions, and Modeling (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical Simulation and Training
- Keywords
- surgical instrument detection, TensorRT, edge computing, YOLOv5, post-training quantization, minimally invasive surgery, laparoscopy, real-time inference, model optimization, speed-accuracy trade-off
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: TensorRT-based surgical instrument detection assessment for deep learning on edge computing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1117/12.3004788
- The paper
- Belhaoua, A., Kimpe, T. R., & Crul, S. (2024). TensorRT-based surgical instrument detection assessment for deep learning on edge computing. Medical Imaging 2024: Image-Guided Procedures, Robotic Interventions, and Modeling. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3004788